Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: This study evaluated whether first-line treatment affects survival outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma undergoing sequential therapy with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and enfortumab vedotin.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 57 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital and its affiliated institutions between 2009 and 2024. Patients received chemotherapy as a first-line treatment (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab or avelumab) and third-line enfortumab vedotin. Assessed outcomes included overall survival and time to treatment failure. Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors for overall survival.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 20.5 months, median overall survival was not reached after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine with cisplatin was selected in 31.6% of cases, while gemcitabine and carboplatin was chosen in 68.4% of cases as the first-line treatment; subsequently, 66.7% received pembrolizumab, and 33.3% received avelumab in the second-line treatment. Patients who achieved a complete or partial response with the first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survivals from both first-line and enfortumab vedotin initiation than those with stable or progressive disease. In cases that achieved complete or partial responses, avelumab was more frequently selected as a second-line therapy. However, in the first-line treatment, multivariate analysis identified only stable or progressive disease as a significant predictor of worse overall survival.
Conclusion: The best response to first-line treatment predicted both overall survival from first-line initiation and outcomes following enfortumab vedotin treatment, underscoring its prognostic value in sequential therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.15686 | DOI Listing |