98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Poor quality communication and language barriers lead to worse care experiences and inferior health care outcomes for those with limited English proficiency. Fewer than one-third of outpatient providers regularly use professional interpreters when communicating with non-English preferring patients. Effective strategies to address language barriers in primary care are lacking and in demand.
Objective: Examine provider perspectives on providing in-person care to Spanish-preferring patients.
Design: Partnered with a large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center predominantly caring for Spanish-preferring Hispanic patients, we identified primary care providers who (1) were language-concordant (provider and patient speak same language); (2) used qualified interpreters; and (3) used informal strategies for interpretation/communication.
Participants: We interviewed 24 providers (10 language-concordant, 9 who used qualified interpreters, 5 who used informal interpreters and other strategies; response-rate 23%).
Approach: We established codes using systematic, inductive procedures to generate insights from responses and identified themes using content analysis.
Results: Providers-both language-concordant and those using interpreters-preferred to speak the same language as the patient, employed varying communication strategies, and required more time to care for Spanish-preferring patients for differing reasons. Using interpreters did not always improve communication because using qualified interpreters requires more time for initiating interpretation, connectivity issues, and conducting consecutive interpretation; using any interpreter requires provider-interpreter clarification or staff to translate, and sometimes interpreters had difficulty with medical content/terminology. Provider-patient visits also qualitatively differed based on language spoken and interpreter use in eliciting concerns, topics covered, patient comprehension, and time spent on rapport-building and patient education.
Conclusions: Providers described barriers that organizations need to address to facilitate effective communication and language interpretation when caring for Spanish-preferring patients. Research is needed that identifies and tests language support strategies for providers and clinics and structural changes that preserve time during patient visits for providers and patients to spend on health care needs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405146 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09414-9 | DOI Listing |
J Gen Intern Med
September 2025
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, USA.
Background: Hypertension is the most prevalent reversible risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Blood pressure (BP) control is poor nationally and varies by race/ethnicity, and there is minimal understanding of the impact of country of origin.
Objective: To examine racial/ethnic disparities in BP control among high-risk patients and among Latino patients disaggregated by country of origin.
J Immigr Minor Health
September 2025
RAND, Santa Monica, United States.
Healthcare provided by bilingual providers or with assistance from qualified interpreters is intended to improve patient-provider communication. Despite federal laws requiring healthcare facilities to provide access to appropriate interpretation language assistance services for patients not proficient in English, many Spanish-preferring patients receive primary care from providers not fluent in Spanish or who regularly use formal interpreters. Partnering with two urban SafetyNet providers in Southern California, we conducted focus groups in Spanish with Spanish-preferring patients who received care from providers who: (1) were Spanish-qualified, (2) used formal interpreters, and (3) used informal interpreters or other communication strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Prev Med
May 2025
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Introduction: The 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/ American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines to manage atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) expanded eligibility for medication. To better understand the guidelines' impact on those who should have been on a statin all along, we performed a cohort study of patients eligible-for-but-never-prescribed statins before the guideline change, evaluating statin eligibility or prescription after the guideline change by race, ethnicity, and preferred language.
Methods: We used 2012-2020 electronic health record data from low-income patients in community health centers (CHCs) in 14 states to evaluate statin eligibility and prescriptions in patients aged 40-75 years, using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression, accounting for clustering of patients within clinics, adjusted for patient demographics, overall healthcare utilization, and comorbidities.
Am J Public Health
June 2025
Nathalie Huguet, Jorge Kaufmann, Heather Holderness, Jeremy Erroba, Rachel Springer, John Heintzman, and Miguel Marino are with the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. Gretchen Mertes and Anna Steeves-Reece are with the Research Department at OCHIN Inc, Por
To assess whether Latino patients receiving care in community-based health centers (CHCs) in US states that expanded Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status to adults 50 years and older had greater insurance coverage after the eligibility amendment compared with states that did not expand eligibility. We performed a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from 40 602 nonpregnant CHC patients aged 50 to 64 years living in states that expanded eligibility (OR, CA) or that did not (AK, CT, IN, MN, MT, NC, NJ, OH, WA) with a visit in both 2018-2019 (before policy change) and 2021-2023 (after policy change). Among Spanish-preferring Latinas, the overall Medicaid-insured difference-in-difference estimate across all 3 years after the amendment was positively moderate (average treatment effect on treated [ATT] = +7.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pediatr Hematol Oncol
May 2025
The influence of ethnicity and language preference on palliative and end-of-life (EOL) experiences in children with cancer is poorly understood. Existing data relies on adult studies and suggests that patients from underserved populations often receive inferior palliative and EOL care, characterized by medically intense care at EOL. This qualitative study explores the EOL experiences of English and Spanish-preferring families of children with poor-prognosis cancers, with the hypothesis that language-based disparities exist.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF