A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Operator learning curve with a novel dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The SPHERE Per-AF trial demonstrated noninferiority for a primary composite effectiveness endpoint in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with a 9-mm, lattice-tip, pulsed field (PF)/radiofrequency (RF) system (74%) vs conventional contact force-sensing RF (65%). Although operators were highly experienced with the control, the vast majority was new to the investigational system.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve using this novel system.

Methods: Patients were grouped based on the sequential procedures performed per operator. Operators who performed ≤2 investigational procedures were excluded. The composite effectiveness endpoint was freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation at any time, recurrence of arrhythmia, drug initiation/escalation, or cardioversion each at 1 year excluding a 3-month blanking period. Efficiency endpoints included "skin-to-skin" procedure time.

Results: The total cohort included 443 patients (235 investigational [31 roll-in], 208 control). Primary effectiveness in the investigational cohort improved significantly with increased procedural order. Efficacy was 65% (74 of 114) for the first 5 patients per operator, 75% (33 of 44) for patients 6 to 10, and 80% (60 of 75) for patients >10. Kaplan-Meier effectiveness estimates at 1-year follow-up were significantly higher in the investigational cohort after 10 procedures performed, compared with control (80% vs 65%, P < .05). With the investigational system, total procedure time was reduced by 25 minutes (100 vs 125) within the first 5 procedures performed (P < .001).

Conclusion: AF ablation with a novel dual-energy, lattice-tip ablation system resulted in greater clinical efficacy compared with conventional RF after a rapid operator learning curve, with superior procedural efficiency noted from the initial procedures onward.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05120193.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

learning curve
12
procedures performed
12
operator learning
8
curve novel
8
novel dual-energy
8
dual-energy lattice-tip
8
lattice-tip ablation
8
ablation system
8
composite effectiveness
8
effectiveness endpoint
8

Similar Publications