Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax leverages complementary mechanisms of action and has shown promising clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib-venetoclax compared with ibrutinib-placebo in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Methods: SYMPATICO is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study performed at 84 hospitals in Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with pathologically confirmed relapsed or refractory MCL after one to five previous lines of therapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ibrutinib 560 mg once daily concurrently with oral venetoclax (5-week ramp-up to 400 mg once daily) or placebo for 2 years, then single-agent ibrutinib 560 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation and treatment assignment occurred via interactive response technology using a stratified permuted block scheme (block sizes of 2 and 4) with stratification by ECOG performance status, previous lines of therapy, and tumour lysis syndrome risk category. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03112174, and is closed to enrolment.

Findings: Between April 26, 2018, and Aug 28, 2019, 267 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned; 134 to the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and 133 to the ibrutinib-placebo group. 211 (79%) of 267 patients were male and 56 (21%) were female. With a median follow-up of 51·2 months (IQR 48·2-55·3), median progression-free survival was 31·9 months (95% CI 22·8-47·0) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and 22·1 months (16·5-29·5) in the ibrutinib-placebo group (hazard ratio 0·65 [95% CI 0·47-0·88]; p=0·0052). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (42 [31%] of 134 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group vs 14 [11%] of 132 patients in the ibrutinib-placebo group), thrombocytopenia (17 [13%] vs ten [8%]), and pneumonia (16 [12%] vs 14 [11%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 81 (60%) of 134 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and in 79 (60%) of 132 patients in the ibrutinib-placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three (2%) of 134 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group (n=1 COVID-19 infection, n=1 cardiac arrest, and n=1 respiratory failure) and in two (2%) of 132 patients in the ibrutinib-placebo group (n=1 cardiac failure and n=1 COVID-19-related pneumonia).

Interpretation: The combination of ibrutinib-venetoclax significantly improved progression-free survival compared with ibrutinib-placebo in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. The safety profile was consistent with known safety profiles of the individual drugs. These findings suggest a positive benefit-risk profile for ibrutinib-venetoclax treatment.

Funding: Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie Company) and Janssen Research and Development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00682-XDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ibrutinib-venetoclax group
20
ibrutinib-placebo group
20
relapsed refractory
16
patients
14
progression-free survival
12
134 patients
12
patients ibrutinib-venetoclax
12
132 patients
12
patients ibrutinib-placebo
12
group
11

Similar Publications

Background: An interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib-venetoclax was superior to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear.

Methods: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has expanded dramatically over the last decade, with a wide range of effective treatments now available. Clinical management of CLL varies widely depending on patient profile, meaning the optimal treatment in Arab patients, who tend to be young and often present with comorbidities, including diabetes and obesity, requires specific considerations. In the absence of regional guidelines, a group of experts from across the Gulf region and one international expert from Germany convened to discuss and agree upon a position statement for venetoclax-based fixed-duration treatment strategies for Arab patients with CLL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax leverages complementary mechanisms of action and has shown promising clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib-venetoclax compared with ibrutinib-placebo in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Methods: SYMPATICO is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study performed at 84 hospitals in Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy Guided by Measurable Residual Disease.

N Engl J Med

January 2024

From the Department of Clinical Hematology (T.M., P.H.) and the Hematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (N.W., S.D., R.T., A.R.), Leeds Cancer Centre, and the Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (D.A.C., D.H., A.H., S.J., N.G., S.G., S.B., J.M.B.) and Leeds Institute of Medical Researc

Article Synopsis
  • * Involved 523 patients in a randomized trial, results showed significantly less disease progression and death in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group compared to the FCR group over a median follow-up of 43.7 months.
  • * A large percentage of patients on the ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy achieved undetectable levels of measurable residual disease (MRD), indicating better long-term outcomes, while infection rates were
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In the GLOW study, fixed-duration ibrutinib-venetoclax showed superior progression-free survival versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who were older or had comorbidities, or both, at a median follow up of 27·7 months. In this Article, we report updated outcomes from GLOW after a 46-month median follow-up.

Methods: GLOW was a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 study done at 67 hospital centres across 14 countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF