Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Adenomatous colorectal polyps require endoscopic resection, as opposed to non-adenomatous hyperplastic colorectal polyps. This study aims to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.

Materials And Methods: Five board-certified radiologists evaluated CT colonography images with colorectal polyps of all sizes and morphologies retrospectively and decided whether the depicted polyps required endoscopic resection. After a primary unassisted reading based on current guidelines, a second reading with access to the classification of a radiomics-based random-forest AI-model labelling each polyp as "non-adenomatous" or "adenomatous" was performed. Performance was evaluated using polyp histopathology as the reference standard.

Results: 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp image series (47% supine position, 53% prone position) were evaluated unassisted and AI-assisted by five independent board-certified radiologists, resulting in a total of 1180 readings (subsequent polypectomy: yes or no). AI-assisted readings had higher accuracy (76% +/- 1% vs. 84% +/- 1%), sensitivity (78% +/- 6% vs. 85% +/- 1%), and specificity (73% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 2%) in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was improved in the AI-assisted readings (Fleiss' kappa 0.69 vs. 0.92).

Conclusion: AI-based characterisation of colorectal polyps at CT colonography as a second reader might enable a more precise selection of polyps eligible for subsequent endoscopic resection. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and histopathologic polyp evaluation is still mandatory.

Key Points: Question This is the first study evaluating the impact of AI-based polyp classification in CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. Findings Compared with unassisted reading, AI-assisted reading had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI tool for colorectal polyp classification in CT colonography could further improve radiologists' therapy recommendations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165980PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal polyps
20
differentiation adenomatous
8
adenomatous non-adenomatous
8
non-adenomatous colorectal
8
polyps
8
polyps colonography
8
colonography radiologists'
8
radiologists' therapy
8
endoscopic resection
8
board-certified radiologists
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To study the results of treatment of cancer in tubular villous adenomas.

Material And Methods: A retrospective analysis included 51 patients with cTis-T1N0M0 between 02.2019 and 09.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical observation of specific changes of auricular points in patients with colorectal polyps: A case-control study.

Medicine (Baltimore)

September 2025

Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

To observe the specific changes of auricular points in patients with colorectal polyps (CPs) by auricular assessment. To summarize the clusters of auricular point-specific changes in patients with CPs, and to inform further research into auricular point assisted diagnosis of CPs. A total of 300 participants, with 150 having CPs and 150 having no CPs, were recruited for this case-control study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Laparoscopic segmental resection (LSR) is a common treatment modality for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has emerged as a promising alternative, yet current evidence of its efficacy remains limited.

Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to compare the therapeutic outcomes of LECS versus LSR for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps and to provide robust evidence for clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening modality for colorectal cancer; however, it is operator-dependent and reliant on exam quality. Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection and clinical outcomes, but this is a sociotechnical challenge that requires effective human-AI teaming incorporating provider attitudes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating attitudes and perspectives of providers toward AI-assisted colonoscopy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Guidelines recommend leaving in situ rectosigmoid polyps diagnosed during colonoscopy that are 5 mm or smaller if the endoscopist optically predicts them to be non-neoplastic. However, no randomised controlled trial has been done to examine the efficacy and safety of this strategy.

Methods: This open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial enrolled adults age 18 years or older undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or clinical indications across four Italian centres.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF