98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The Uniform Determination of Death Act requires brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination to be in accordance with "accepted medical standards." The medical organizations responsible for delineating these guidelines are only specified statutorily in two states. State health organizations (SHOs) are composed of policy experts and medical professionals who are responsible for addressing medical, ethical, and legislative problems related to health. We sought to evaluate information publicly available on SHO websites regarding BD/DNC.
Methods: From December 2023 to August 2024, we searched SHO (health department, medical board, medical society, and hospital association) websites for the 48 states without statutory guidance regarding what constitutes accepted medical standards for information regarding BD/DNC using the terms "brain death," "brain stem," and "determination of death." All posts related to BD/DNC were reviewed and categorized via thematic analysis.
Results: Of the 192 SHO websites searched, there were 35 from 28 states that provided information regarding BD/DNC: 14 medical societies, 12 health departments, 8 hospital associations, and 1 medical board. Of these 35 SHOs, 12 referenced the state's legal statute, 11 referenced hospital/state/model policies or guidance, 3 referenced both legal statutes and hospital/state/model policies or guidelines, 3 referenced explicit support for standardized BD/DNC guidelines, and 6 made other mention of BD/DNC. New York was the only state with an SHO that provided clear guidance regarding accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination.
Conclusions: For most states, the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination are not identified on SHO websites or statutorily. This contributes to inconsistencies across hospital BD/DNC determination policies, leading to medical, ethical, and legal challenges. Delineation of the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination in each state could help facilitate consistency and accuracy in BD/DNC determination, prevent false positive determinations of death, and promote public trust in BD/DNC determination and the medical system overall.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02209-6 | DOI Listing |
World J Crit Care Med
September 2025
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Havana 10400, Cuba.
The Jahi McMath case represents a pivotal moment in the reevaluation of brain death or death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC) and disorders of consciousness. Declared brain dead on December 12, 2013, following surgical complications, Jahi's case became a landmark in challenging conventional BD/DNC definitions. As an independent consultant for the International Brain Research Foundation, I recommended advanced ancillary tests, including neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and heart rate variability assessments, conducted at Rutgers University Hospital and Jahi's apartment in New Jersey.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurocrit Care
August 2025
Department of Neurotrauma Unit, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) is accepted as legal death throughout much of the world. The World Brain Death Project and a subsequent review of the literature through 2023 highlighted several medicolegal controversies related to BD/DNC in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States but did not discuss medicolegal controversies related to BD/DNC in low- and middle-income countries, such as India. Although the Transplantation of Human Organs Act of 1994 acknowledged BD/DNC as death in India, BD/DNC evaluations are not always completed when BD/DNC is suspected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurol Clin Pract
August 2025
Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; and.
Background And Objectives: In recent decades, many legal cases have resulted from physicians ineffectively communicating to a family that their loved one is brain dead (brain dead/death by neurologic criteria [BD/DNC]). Although the definition of BD/DNC has recently undergone revision, little research has been conducted to establish optimal approaches in communicating BD/DNC status to families. The aim of this study was to characterize what highly experienced physicians perceive to be the best communication practices and language choices during BD/DNC conversations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Crit Care Med
June 2025
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Objectives: To explore health professionals' experiences of contested pediatric brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) cases, including factors contributing to conflict, resource needs and utilization, perceived utility of supports available, and case resolution and aftermath.
Design And Methods: Inductive thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Contestation of Pediatric Brain Death Task Force.
Setting: Ten institutions across seven U.
J Pediatr
July 2025
Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU HWCOM); Division of Critical Care Medicine, Nicklaus Children's Hospital.
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) in children and adolescents declared brain dead (BD)/death by neurologic criteria (DNC) and to evaluate the association between cause of brain injury and the development of AVP-D.
Study Design: We retrospectively analyzed 53 pediatric BD/DNC patients ages 0-21 years from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary children's hospital to assess the prevalence of AVP-D and compare those patients with and without AVP-D. AVP-D frequency by injury mechanism (anoxic brain injury, traumatic brain injury, malignancy) was also analyzed.