A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effects of different microfracture drilling parameters on bone quality: a finite element analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Microfracture drilling is a surgical technique that involves creating multiple perforations in areas of cartilage defects to recruit stem cells from the bone marrow, thereby promoting cartilage regeneration in the knee joint. Increasing the exposed bone marrow surface area (more holes in the same area) can enhance stem cell outflow. However, when the exposed area is large, it may affect the mechanical strength of the bone at the site of the cartilage defect. The purpose of this study is to use the finite element method to analyze the effects of drilling diameter, hole spacing, and drilling depth during microfracture surgery on the stability of the bone structure at the cartilage defect site.

Methods: In this study, a normal knee joint model was selected for solid modeling, and a model of a femoral medial condyle cartilage defect was constructed. Microfracture holes with different diameters (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm), depths (10 mm, 30 mm), and spacings (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm) were created in the femoral medial condyle cartilage defect model. Using Ansys software, the knee joint's loading conditions in the standing position were simulated, and the structural stability of the model was analyzed. The holes in areas of stress concentration were selected for more detailed mechanical analysis.

Results: The Von Mises stresses for all the drilling parameters did not exceed the yield strength of the bone. Changes in the drilling parameters did not affect the bone structure around the holes. When smaller diameter drilling tools with closer spacing were used, the average maximum Von Mises stress and the average Von Mises stress on the holes were the lowest.

Conclusion: Although the optimal combination of drilling parameters was not determined, this study provides a mechanical reference for the effects of drilling parameters on bone quality. It demonstrates that using smaller diameter drilling tools with closer spacing in areas of the same defect size results in a greater number of holes, with a lesser impact on bone stability. This study provides a mechanical reference for microfracture drilling.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751024PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1515136DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drilling parameters
20
cartilage defect
16
microfracture drilling
12
von mises
12
drilling
11
bone
9
parameters bone
8
bone quality
8
finite element
8
bone marrow
8

Similar Publications