98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Despite rigorous evidence of improved quality of life and longer survival, disparities in the utilization of palliative and hospice care persist for racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. This study evaluated the impact of psychosocial factors on utilization of these services.
Methods: Patients with advanced lung cancer were recruited at a large academic urban hospital. Patients were surveyed about their knowledge of palliative care and hospice and their beliefs regarding medical mistrust, lung cancer care, palliative care and hospice. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between mistrust, knowledge and beliefs among the entire cohort and minority (Black and Hispanic) and non-minority patients on utilization of palliative care consultation and hospice care use.
Results: Ninety-nine of the enrolled participants had a mean age of 64 years. Minority patients were more likely to receive a palliative care referral (p < 0.001) and attend a consult (p = 0.003). Similarly, they were more likely to receive a hospice referral (p = 0.04), however there was no difference in hospice care use based on minority status (p = 0.102). In our adjusted model, older patients and those reporting negative lung cancer beliefs were more likely to receive hospice care (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.004-1.138; OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.002-1.093, respectively).
Conclusion: Minority patients with advanced lung cancer were more likely to receive a palliative care referral and specialty level consultation when compared to non-minority patients. Our work highlights the importance of proactive referral processes in facilitating access to palliative and hospice services, particularly among younger patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739718 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70518 | DOI Listing |
Orv Hetil
September 2025
2 Méltóságért Alapítvány Budakeszi Magyarország.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Importance: Patients with advanced cancer frequently receive broad-spectrum antibiotics, but changing use patterns across the end-of-life trajectory remain poorly understood.
Objective: To describe the patterns of broad-spectrum antibiotic use across defined end-of-life intervals in patients with advanced cancer.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study used data from the South Korean National Health Insurance Service database to examine broad-spectrum antibiotic use among patients with advanced cancer who died between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2021.
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Support Care Cancer
September 2025
Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Purpose: To clarify the preferred timing and contents of early palliative care and preference for continued care delivery among patients with advanced cancer in Japan.
Methods: We conducted an Internet-based anonymous questionnaire survey on adult patients with advanced cancer. We assessed the patients' wishes for palliative care delivered by a team or at outpatient clinics while asymptomatic, as well as the preferred intervention timing and preference for continuing care lifelong.
Eur J Prev Cardiol
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Aim: This study aimed to establish general consensus on a systematic needs assessment model to determine eligibility for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as part of secondary prevention in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). Specific objectives included identifying relevant needs assessment criteria and establishing consensus on referral criteria.
Methods: A Delphi study was conducted following the ACCORD guidelines (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) with participation of an international, multi-disciplinary expert panel including physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals, across primary and secondary care as well as academic research.