A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Accelerating the Future of Oncology Drug Development: The Role of Consortia in the Delivery of Precision Oncology Early Phase Clinical Trials. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Over the past 15 years, the landscape of early phase clinical trials (EPCTs) has undergone a remarkable expansion in both quantity and intricacy. The proliferation of sites, trials, sponsors, and contract research organizations has surged exponentially, marking a significant shift in research conduct. However, EPCT operations suffer from numerous inefficiencies, such as cumbersome start-up processes, which are particularly critical when drug safety and the recommended phase II dose need to be established in a timely manner. Networks and consortia may overcome some of these challenges of enrolling suitable patients and streamlining start-up, particularly when distance and disease trajectory come into play.

Design: In this article, we provide an overview of EPCT consortia in adult oncology across different continents assembled through systematic review of the literature and snowball sampling methodology. We illustrate their scope, structure, funding, and achievements.

Results: Fifteen EPCT consortia were identified including two in the United States, three in Europe, five in Asia-Pacific, two intercontinental consortia, and three within private oncology networks. These consortia vary in their scope, funding, and structure from government-funded models such as the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Networks through charitably funded and private research organizations. EPCT consortia play a role in collaborative research, molecular tumor boards to provide patient-centric biomarker-matched treatments, and streamlining trial conduct to improve timelines and cost efficiency.

Conclusion: The growth in EPCT activity and complexity has resulted in expansion in the number of EPCT consortia globally. By actively engaging with regulatory bodies and pharmaceutical and contract research organization industries, consortia have an opportunity to address the evolving challenges faced in this field and to accelerate the translation of scientific discoveries into clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01534DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epct consortia
16
clinical trials
12
consortia
9
early phase
8
phase clinical
8
networks consortia
8
epct
6
accelerating future
4
oncology
4
future oncology
4

Similar Publications