A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) survey in preparation for TIS 2.0. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) has gained acceptance and has led to literature validating original concepts and suggesting refinements. In preparation for the second edition of TIS, editors generated a survey to solicit experience with and opinions about TIS.

Materials And Methods: An online survey available from March 8 to June 15, 2024, included 56 questions, offered in 7 languages, related to the practice of serous fluid cytopathology.

Results: A total of 598 respondents accessed the survey. Information was collected regarding certification, work setting, work volume and years in practice. In the respondent group, 78% (401 of 513) were pathologists, 18% (92 of 513) cytologists of cytotechnologists, 2% (10 of 513) trainees, and 2% (10 of 513) medical scientists. A total of 23% of participants came from academia. Also, 59% of respondents were (280 of 474) from Asia, 17% Europe, 12% North America, and 10% South America. In all, 61% (287 of 474) have adopted TIS. Over 50% issue a preliminary report awaiting ancillary test results. Another 20% issue such a report depending on circumstance. The most frequent request for refinement of criteria centered around Atypia of Uncertain Significance (AUS). Only small numbers of participants provided data on diagnostic category percentage and risk of malignancy (ROM); however, those that did reported a decrease in nondiagnostic and atypical results with corresponding decreases in ROM for those categories. Variable use of cytochemical and immunocytochemical stains for resolving mesothelial proliferations was reported. Respondents indicated a desire for incorporation of recommendations on clinical management and extension of TIS into body fluid types beyond pleural, pericardial, and peritoneal.

Conclusions: This survey examines acceptance of TIS and advice for future directions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2024.12.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serous fluid
12
international system
8
system serous
8
fluid cytopathology
8
cytopathology tis
8
tis
7
survey
5
fluid
4
tis survey
4
survey preparation
4

Similar Publications