Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Lower ministernotomy offers the advantage of providing excellent visualization of the 4 cardiac cavities, thus allowing surgical treatment of the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valves as well as any intracavitary procedure. Information on technical issues, as well as safety and echocardiographic results of this approach, are sparse. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe outcomes of lower ministernotomy to treat valvulopathies and for other intracardiac surgical procedures.

Methods: All consecutive patients aged more than 18 years who underwent cardiac surgery by ministernotomy between January 2017 and March 2023 in our institution (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France) were included in this retrospective study. Main outcome variables were all-cause mortality, postoperative complications, and echocardiographic results.

Results: During the 6-year study period, 633 patients were treated through a lower ministernotomy. Among them, 338 patients had aortic valve surgery (AVS) with or without tricuspid annuloplasty (TA), 254 had mitral valve surgery (MVS) with or without TA, 25 had AVS and MVS with or without TA, and 38 had other types of intracardiac surgery. Hospital survival was 99.1% in the AVS group, 98.1% in the MVS with or without TA group, 96% in the AVS and MVS with or without TA group, and 97.4% in the other intracardiac surgery group. Only 1 patient required repeat osteosynthesis in the entire cohort, and 12 (2.1%) patients had mediastinitis. A total of 162 (25%) patients received transfusions, 11 patients (1.7%) had permanent strokes, and 49 (7.5%) underwent new pacemaker implantation.

Conclusions: Lower ministernotomy is a safe approach for treating all valvulopathies, separately or concomitantly, and other intracardiac diseases, and it is associated with a low rate of morbidity and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lower ministernotomy
20
approach treating
8
retrospective study
8
valve surgery
8
avs mvs
8
intracardiac surgery
8
mvs group
8
patients
6
lower
5
ministernotomy
5

Similar Publications

Objective: Whether minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) offers an advantage over conventional AVR (CAVR) remains a matter of debate. Although some studies have suggested better postoperative outcomes with MIAVR, technical challenges and longer operative times remain major obstacles to the adoption of these techniques. In this meta-analysis, we compare the reported immediate postoperative outcomes of both approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 79-year-old man with severe aortic valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation was referred to our department for surgery. Computed tomography revealed persistent left superior vena cava. Lower mini-sternotomy was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Minithoracotomy versus ministernotomy aortic valve replacement.

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

April 2025

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, WA 6009 Australia.

Objective: It is debatable which minimally invasive strategy is better for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of AVR through right anterior minithoracotomy (RAT) versus ministernotomy.

Methods: A series of 162 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive AVR (107 RAT and 55 ministernotomy) from August 2013 to May 2022 were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement have become increasingly popular. The most common minimally invasive approaches are mini-sternotomy and right anterior mini-thoracotomy. We aimed to review the literature and compare clinical outcomes for these two approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: The minimally invasive approach, performed via ministernotomy, is now often preferred for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, its benefits in patients with prior cardiac surgery remain unclear. This article compares traditional and minimally invasive surgery for isolated aortic valve replacement in reoperative cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF