A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Comparison on Dual-phase Cone-beam CT, Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and Tc-macroaggregated albumin-SPECT/CT in predicting final distribution volumes and dosimetry of the post-embolization Y PET/CT. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Personalized treatment schemes are being systematically applied to ensure best treatment outcome in oncologic patients. This is true also for personalized dosimetry in transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Precise and detailed volumetric and functional data derived from radiological and nuclear imaging methods are essential for personalized dosimetry. We sought to evaluate accuracy of dual-phase cone-beam CT (CBCT) in comparison to pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), and Tc-macroaggregated albumin-SPECT/CT ([Tc]MAA SPECT/CT) to predict and assess the efficacy of TARE based on post-treatment Y PET/CT.

Material And Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with HCC treated with TARE were included. Intraprocedural dual-phase CBCT acquisition protocol was developed to distinguish tumor volume in the early arterial phase and perfused volume of non-affected liver in the late arterial phase. Volumetric data obtained from pre-treatment CECT, dual-phase CBCT and [Tc]MAA SPECT/CT were compared to post-treatment Y PET/CT considered the standard reference. Treatment simulations for final calculated dose from the different imaging derived volumes were then compared to post-treatment Y PET/CT.

Results: CBCT resulted as the most accurate method in predicting tumor- (R 0.88) and perfused volumes (R 0.82). Dosimetry prediction planning performed on derived volumes from the different methods did not show significant difference (p < 0.05), yet highest concordance with Y PET/CT data was observed with dual-phase CBCT.

Conclusion: Our study shows that dual-phase CBCT acquisition is a novel alternative method for correctly and safely administering more accurate and defined doses during TARE.

Clinicaltrials: gov ID: NCT03981497.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008061PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01946-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma
8
dual-phase cone-beam
8
tc-macroaggregated albumin-spect/ct
8
personalized dosimetry
8
[tc]maa spect/ct
8
dual-phase cbct
8
arterial phase
8
compared post-treatment
8
derived volumes
8
radioembolization hepatocellular
4

Similar Publications