Oral Microbiome Signatures as Potential Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment.

J Gastrointest Surg

Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Departments of Microbiology & Immunology, Epidemiology & Population Health, and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Published: December 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The oral microbiota was investigated for distinguishable characteristics between GC, premalignant gastric conditions (Pre-GC), and control participants.

Methods: Mouthwash samples from GC, Pre-GC, and control participants at a tertiary care center were prospectively collected. Following DNA extraction and sequencing, analyses of oral microbiome biodiversity and composition were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to evaluate the discriminative power of oral microbiome signatures.

Results: Oral samples from 98 participants included 30 (30.6%) GC, 30 (30.6%) Pre-GC and 38 (38.8%) controls. Of these, 61 (62.2%) were female, 31 (31.6%) were Hispanic, and 18 (18.3%) were smokers. GC compared to controls demonstrated notable differences in beta diversity (Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity, p<0.02). 32 bacterial genera were found to be differentially abundant when comparing GC and controls, and 23 bacterial genera demonstrated differential abundance when comparing Pre-GC and controls (W-statistic >2). Minimal compositional differences between GC and Pre-GC were found, with only three differentially abundant bacterial genera (W-statistic >2). Models were constructed from the most significant bacterial signatures (W-statistic >5). These models discriminated between GC and control oral samples with an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.808, 0.952) and between Pre-GC and control oral samples with an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI 0.887, 0.999).

Conclusions: Oral rinses of GC and Pre-GC participants exhibited distinct but similar microbiome profiles, distinguishing them from controls. This compositional difference raises the possibility of utilizing these microbial signatures to predict GC risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101933DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral microbiome
12
pre-gc control
12
oral samples
12
oral
8
gastric cancer
8
w-statistic models
8
control oral
8
samples auc
8
pre-gc
6
microbiome signatures
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the full-thickness palatal graft technique (FTPGT) and the coronally advanced flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft (CAF + SCTG) in achieving complete root coverage (CRC) in single gingival recessions (GR).

Methods: Forty healthy patients with a single RT1 GR were randomized into two groups: 20 treated with CAF + SCTG and 20 with FTPGT. Baseline and 12-month measurements of GR, keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival thickness (GT) were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Creating effective treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains a critical global health challenge. This study investigates the antidiabetic mechanisms of subsp. B-53 ( B-53) in T2DM mice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: There is a considerable interest in the association between and colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, it was suggested that this association is valid only for a distinct clade of ( C2) and that strains belonging to another clade ( C1) are only associated with the oral cavity. It was further suggested that this made C1 a natural comparator when looking for candidate genes associated with the pathogenicity of C2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development of dental caries is a dynamic process; yet, there is limited knowledge on microbial differences at various stages of caries at higher resolution. To investigate the shifting microbiome profiles across different caries stages, 30 children were enrolled in this study, including 15 caries-active patients and 15 caries-free individuals. Plaque samples were collected from the buccal surface of caries-free subjects, defined as confident health (CH; = 15).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Can We Combine Mouthrinses With Probiotics? An Evaluation of Their Compatibility and Combined Therapy on Oral Biofilms.

J Periodontal Res

September 2025

Department of Oral Health Sciences, Periodontology and Oral Microbiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Aim: Multiple oral pathologies requiring antiseptic mouthrinses for prevention or treatment. However, nonselective elimination of the microbes may also harm beneficial commensal, healthy bacteria. Promicrobial strategies, such as probiotics, aim to rebalance the oral microbiome rather than eradicate it; however, we hypothesised that their incorporation might be challenged due to the microbiome's inherent resistance to outsiders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF