A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

An Evaluation of a Point-of-Care GEM Premier ChemSTAT Analyzer in an Emergency Department: Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Optimization of Patient Flow. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Having a laboratory renal profile for medical imaging examinations requiring contrast media (CM) administration is strongly advised. Creatinine helps identify patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The GEM Premierâ„¢ ChemSTAT (Werfen) is a point-of-care (POC) analyzer with 12 emergency parameters, including a creatinine assay. This study aims to compare ChemSTAT with the central analytical solution of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand and to evaluate the interest in using POC creatinine in the emergency department (ED) to optimize the flow of patients, especially when CM administration is necessary. More than 200 whole blood (WB) samples from the ED were evaluated on the ChemSTAT analyzer. As comparative methods, the plasma aliquots from the same samples were assayed on an Atellica CH (Siemens Healthineers). The clinical concordance was assessed according to the decision cut-offs of the French Society of Radiology for the risk of CIN. The availability times of biological results between ChemSTAT and the central laboratory were studied. WB results from the ChemSTAT analyzer correlated well with those from the Atellica CH, except for tCO2 (the known bias between the Siemens and Cobas Roche methods for predicting ChemSTAT values). The results of the creatinine assay allow for identical medical decisions in comparison to the renal-risk cut-offs. The availability of the biological results was reduced by 50 min on average with ChemSTAT vs the central laboratory. Computed tomography (CT) was performed for 44.7% of patients, including the injection of the CM in 68% of cases. For these patients, the availability of creatinine results relative to imaging time is faster with the ChemSTAT by an average of 45.2 min. Great analytical and clinical correlations for creatinine assays allow for the safe identification of patients at risk of CIN, and improve patient flow in ED, especially for those requiring computed tomography with CM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11642727PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237174DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chemstat analyzer
12
chemstat central
12
chemstat
9
analyzer emergency
8
emergency department
8
contrast-induced nephropathy
8
patient flow
8
patients risk
8
creatinine assay
8
risk cin
8

Similar Publications