A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Digital Pathology-based Artificial Intelligence Biomarker Validation in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Objective: Owing to the expansion of treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and an appreciation of clinical subgroups with differential prognosis and treatment responses, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are needed to personalize care in this setting. Our aim was to evaluate a multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) biomarker for prognostic ability in mHSPC.

Methods: We used data from the phase 3 CHAARTED trial; 456/790 patients with mHSPC had evaluable digital histopathology images and requisite clinical variables to generate MMAI scores for inclusion in our analysis. We assessed the association of MMAI score with overall survival (OS), clinical progression (CP), and castration-resistant PC (CRPC) via univariable Cox proportional-hazards and Fine-Gray models.

Key Findings And Limitations: In the analysis cohort, 370 patients (81.1%) were classified as MMAI-high and 86 (18.9%) as MMAI-intermediate/low risk. Estimated 5-yr OS was 39% for the MMAI-high, 58% for the MMAI-intermediate, and 83% for the MMAI-low groups (log-rank p < 0.001). The MMAI score was associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-1.73; p < 0.001), CP (subdistribution HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.36-1.74; p < 0.001), and CRPC (subdistribution HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.45-1.83; p < 0.001). The proportion of MMAI-high cases was 50.0%, 83.7%, 66.7%, and 92.1% in the subgroups with low-volume metachronous (n = 74), low-volume synchronous (n = 80), high-volume metachronous (n = 48), and high-volume synchronous (n = 254) mHSPC, respectively. The MMAI biomarker remained prognostic after adjustment for treatment, volume status, and diagnosis stage.

Conclusions And Clinical Implications: Our findings show that the MMAI biomarker is prognostic for OS, CP, and CRPC among patients with mHSPC, regardless of clinical subgroup or treatment received. Further investigations of MMAI biomarkers in advanced PC are warranted.

Patient Summary: We looked at the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that interprets images of samples of prostate cancer tissue in a group of men whose cancer had spread beyond the prostate. The AI tool was able to identify patients at higher risk of worse outcomes. These results show the potential benefit of AI tools in helping patients and their health care team in making treatment decisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369405PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.11.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

artificial intelligence
8
prostate cancer
8
digital pathology-based
4
pathology-based artificial
4
intelligence biomarker
4
biomarker validation
4
validation metastatic
4
metastatic prostate
4
cancer background
4
background objective
4

Similar Publications