A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of the efficacy of vaginal micronised progesterone tablet and gel for fertilisation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Luteal phase support (LPS) with progesterone is a generally accepted practice after controlled ovarian stimulation, although the best protocols for LPS have been debated. We aimed to compare the efficacy of vaginal micronised progesterone tablets and 8% vaginal progesterone gel for LPS using real-world data.

Methods: This retrospective study included 459 fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles performed at a university hospital from 2005 to 2019. All cycles were followed by fresh day 3 embryo transfer (ET). Either progesterone tablets or gel was used for LPS. To control the conditional probability of progesterone tablets or gel use, doubly robust inverse probability weighting composed of inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) and regression adjustment (RA). IPTW was performed based on the covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS).

Results: Progesterone tablets were administered in 65 cycles, and progesterone gel was administered in 394 cycles. Women who used progesterone tablets were more likely to be older (36 vs. 34 years), have primary infertility (78.5% vs. 61.4%), use gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (60.0% vs. 43.2%), and have fewer retrieved oocytes (seven vs. nine) and transferred embryos (two vs. three) than participants who used progesterone gel. After IPTW-CBPS and RA analysis for the above covariates, the adjusted odds for clinical pregnancy in women who used progesterone tablets were 1.10 times compared with women who used progesterone gel; however, the 95% confidence interval did not reach statistical significance (0.96-1.26).

Conclusions: Clinical pregnancy was comparable between vaginal micronised progesterone tablets and vaginal progesterone gel for LPS in fresh day 3 ET cycles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2436518DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

progesterone tablets
28
progesterone gel
20
progesterone
14
vaginal micronised
12
micronised progesterone
12
gel lps
12
women progesterone
12
efficacy vaginal
8
gel
8
tablets vaginal
8

Similar Publications