98%
921
2 minutes
20
Despite medical advances, diabetes management remains a considerable challenge in the United States, with little to no improvement in patient outcomes and stark disparities in underserved communities. One acute challenge is that, as the US population with diabetes grows steadily-numbering 38.4 million people today-there are too few endocrinologists available to treat the disease and the burdens on primary care professionals, who treat more than 90% of cases currently, are staggering. This disconnect between need and care capacity presents what may be the greatest of many threats to the care of diabetic Americans. To understand what is required to solve this need-to-capacity mismatch, we examine the critical role of primary care professionals and propose national policy approaches to empower and improve the nation's primary care architecture for the nearly 12% of Americans who have diabetes. Policy recommendations encompass the integration of the chronic care model and the patient-centered medical home approach, expansion of workforce development initiatives, and payment reform to incentivize team-based care with the aim of ensuring equitable access to essential diabetes management tools. We urge policy makers to prioritize primary care workforce development, enhance reimbursement models, and implement strategies to mitigate disparities in diabetes care. Evidence reviewed here highlights the critical need for a comprehensive, multidimensional approach to diabetes management in primary care, emphasizing the importance of decisive action by policy makers to equip primary care professionals with the necessary resources and support to effectively address the nation's diabetes epidemic.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588362 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.3175 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Res Protoc
September 2025
Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Background: Assisted vaginal birth is a lifesaving procedure where health workers use special devices to expedite birth vaginally when some complications emerge, such as due to prolonged labor. When the use of assisted vaginal birth is possible and appropriate, it provides benefits over cesarean section. These benefits include shorter recovery, reduced hospital stays, lower risks of complications, cost savings, and greater likelihood of vaginal birth in future pregnancies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRheumatology (Oxford)
September 2025
Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
JAMA Intern Med
September 2025
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Hospitals have reported growing difficulty in discharging patients in a timely manner, often citing bottlenecks in postacute care. Medicare Advantage plans, now the dominant form of Medicare coverage, may contribute to these delays due to administrative and network constraints, yet national evidence is lacking.
Objective: To quantify changes in hospital length of stay for Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare beneficiaries.
JAMA Pediatr
September 2025
Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Importance: Adolescents account for almost half of the 2.5 million diagnosed sexually transmitted infections in the US annually, and the emergency department functions as the primary source of health care for many adolescents. No recommendations exist for emergency department gonorrhea and chlamydia screening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston.
Importance: Trisomy 13 (T13) and trisomy 18 (T18) are chromosomal abnormalities with high mortality rates in the first year of life. Understanding differences in long-term survival between children with full vs mosaic or partial trisomy is crucial for prognosis and health care planning.
Objective: To examine the differences in 10-year survival between children with full T13 and T18 vs those with mosaic or partial trisomy.