Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The drifting speed and trajectory of fish aggregation devices (FADs) influence tuna aggregation behavior. Based on expertise, fishermen modify FAD structures to slow down drifting speed, but few studies quantify material and structure effects on this speed. To address this, 14 different types of FAD models were tested under 5 different current velocities in a flume tank and compared drifting using pairwise Wilcoxon tests. Results indicate that 1) FAD models covered with netting exhibited higher drifting speeds than the others. 2) It is feasible that replacing the netting bundle with the cotton rope of the same diameter for constructing submerged structure effectively slows down the drifting speeds of FADs. 3) Additionally, FAD models with a floating structure aspect ratio close to 1 exhibited slower drifting speeds compared to other designs when the submerged structure is the same.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117282 | DOI Listing |