A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The role of F-FDG PET/MRI in assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the use of F-2-[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET/MRI (Positron emission tomography-computed tomography) in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC) compared to the use of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) alone.

Methods: We searched numerous databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Science Direct, using curated keywords. The variance of each study was determined using the binomial distribution, and STATA version 14 was used to analyze the data by performing random-effect models. Additionally, we calculated study heterogeneity using the chi-squared test and I index and utilized funnel plots and Egger tests to assess publication bias.

Results: The current investigation analyzed 239 patients from six published studies. The pooled estimated sensitivity and specificity of F-FDG PET/MRI was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.92, I = 100% and P = 0.000) and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.72, I = 99.8% and P = 0.000), respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.78 (95%CI = 0.59 to 0.96, I = 100% and P = 0.000) and 0.56 (95%CI = 0.33 to 0.80, I = 99.8% and P = 0.000), respectively.

Conclusions: Based on our findings, the combined form of F-FDG PET/MRI imaging is more sensitive and specific than MRI alone for predicting response to NAC in BC patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577720PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02507-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

f-fdg pet/mri
12
response neoadjuvant
8
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
8
patients breast
8
breast cancer
8
nac patients
8
sensitivity specificity
8
i = 100% p = 0000
8
i = 998% p = 0000
8
role f-fdg
4

Similar Publications