A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Analysing trunk and arm motion in volleyball jump serve: a comparison of straight line and diagonal line techniques. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the disparities in trunk rotation and attack arm movement and their effect on hand kinematics adjustments between straight-line (SL) and diagonal-line (DL) volleyball jump serves. Thirteen male professional volleyball players (age 21.53 ± 5.39 years, height 1.95 ± 0.06 m, body mass 86.48 ± 11.63 kg, experience 8.61 ± 3.47 years) performed SL and DL jump serve, with three-dimensional coordinate data captured using a motion capture system (200 hz). Paired t-test and statistical parametric mapping examined kinematic differences between the two serving directions. At ball contact (BC), the speed of the attack arm hand was significantly faster in DL (16.99 ± 1.36 m/s) compared to SL (16.37 ± 1.53 m/s), whereas the face angle was significantly smaller in DL (1.98 ± 11.75°) than in SL (17.60 ± 17.98°). Forward rotation angles of the pelvic and upper torso at BC were significantly greater in DL (28.47 ± 10.89°; 21.30 ± 10.25°) than in SL (18.27 ± 12.46°; 9.09 ± 14.41°). During the arm swing phase, the pelvic's forward rotation angles in DL were significantly greater than in SL at 42-72% spiking motion, and the upper torso's angles were significantly greater at 49-58% spiking motion. These findings underscore the importance of adjusting pelvic and upper torso rotations to control the hand's face angle when serving in the diagonal line.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2024.2423097DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

volleyball jump
8
jump serve
8
attack arm
8
face angle
8
forward rotation
8
rotation angles
8
pelvic upper
8
upper torso
8
angles greater
8
spiking motion
8

Similar Publications