98%
921
2 minutes
20
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis is dependent on the accurate detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) remain the cornerstone of the laboratory part of APS diagnosis. In the 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) APS classification criteria, the type of laboratory parameters remain essentially unchanged compared with the updated Sapporo classification criteria, and aCL and aβ2GPI measurement are still restricted to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with moderate and high titer aPL thresholds defined as 40 and 80 Units, respectively, and a cutoff calculated by the 99th percentile has been abandoned. We must differentiate between classification criteria and assessment of aPL in clinical care. Classification criteria are strict and meant for participant inclusion in studies and trials to study homogeneous populations of patients. In contrast, laboratory detection for APS diagnosis in daily practice is broader, meant to diagnose each APS patient to optimize their management. Nowadays, there is increasing use of measurement of aPL by methods other than ELISAs , the semiquantitative reporting of titers is a matter of debate, as well as the role of the isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgA, and the role of other aPL, such as antiphosphatidylserine (aPS)/prothrombin (PT) antibodies. Patients diagnosed with the disease may or may not fulfill the classification criteria, and inappropriate use of classification criteria may lead to mis(under)diagnosis. The aim of this guidance, based on literature and expert opinion, is to provide guidance recommendations for laboratory workers and clinicians on routine diagnostic assessment of patients with suspected APS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.022 | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Rev
September 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Background: The aim of this review is to present the role of intraoperative flow cytometry (IFC) in the intracranial tumor surgery. This scoping review aims to summarize current evidence on the intraoperative use of IFC in patients with intracranial tumors.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Medline, Cochrane and Scopus databases up to January 21, 2025.
Khirurgiia (Mosk)
September 2025
Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University, Ryazan, Russia.
Objective: To determine the distribution of patients with different anterior abdominal wall deformities.
Material And Methods: Physical data, CT and morphological findings were analyzed in 622 patients. The study was conducted in retro- and prospective nature.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
September 2025
Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nail toxicities are a frequent yet underreported adverse effect of cancer therapies. These toxicities can significantly impact patients' quality of life and may lead to treatment modifications or interruptions. This narrative review aims to analyse the types, severity and underlying mechanisms of nail toxicities associated with cancer treatments as well as their management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) describes a rare condition characterized by interstitial lung disease (ILD) with autoimmune manifestations in the absence of defined autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). Although the classification was established in 2015, prospective data on disease progression remain limited.
Objectives: To identify predictors of ILD progression in IPAF patients using three criteria: 1) progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), 2) INBUILD criteria, 3) absolute FVC decline ≥10%.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
The goal was to develop a pragmatic classification system for conditions associated with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), aiming to enhance diagnosis, management, education, and research of CPP. An international, multidisciplinary panel participated in a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi consensus. This panel included healthcare professionals, medical society representatives, experts, individuals with lived experience of pain, advocacy groups, researchers, educators, and journal editors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF