A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Value of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Liver Metastases: A 10-Year Outcome. | LitMetric

The Value of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Liver Metastases: A 10-Year Outcome.

Ann Surg Oncol

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Published: February 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the impact of primary tumor resection (PTR) on the prognosis of four common primary tumors with liver metastases, and to develop a prognostic model to visualize the PTR benefit rate of patients with liver metastases.

Materials And Methods: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), pancreatic cancer liver metastases (PLM), gastric cancer liver metastases (GLM), and breast cancer liver metastases (BLM) between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and assigned to either the surgery or non-surgery groups. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Surgical patients who survived longer than the median cancer-specific survival (CSS) time for non-surgery patients constituted the benefit group. Logistic regression was conducted to explore the independent factors affecting surgical benefit, and a nomogram was established.

Results: A total of 21,928 patients with liver metastases were included. After PSM for surgery and non-surgery patients, we found that PTR had a significant impact on the overall survival (OS) and CSS of CRLM, PLM, and BLM patients. In CRLM patients, age (p < 0.001), primary site (p = 0.006), grade (p = 0.009), N stage (p = 0.034), and histology (p = 0.006) affected the surgical benefit. In BLM patients, the independent factors were age (p = 0.002), race (p = 0.020), and radiotherapy (p = 0.043). And in PLM patients, chemotherapy was an independent factor associated with a survival benefit from PTR.

Conclusion: PTR improved OS and CSS in patients with CRLM, PLM, and BLM. A predictive model was established to identify suitable candidates for PTR in CRLM patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698763PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16386-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver metastases
28
cancer liver
16
patients liver
12
patients
9
primary tumor
8
tumor resection
8
liver
8
surgery non-surgery
8
survival css
8
non-surgery patients
8

Similar Publications