A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of image quality and lesion conspicuity between conventional and deep learning reconstruction in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the image quality and lesion conspicuity of conventional vs deep learning (DL)-based reconstructed three-dimensional T1-weighted images in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: This prospective study (NCT05182099) enrolled participants scheduled for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI due to suspected focal liver lesions (FLLs) who provided signed informed consent. A liver MRI was conducted using a 3-T scanner. T1-weighted images were reconstructed using both conventional and DL-based (AIR Recon DL 3D) reconstruction algorithms. Three radiologists independently reviewed the image quality and lesion conspicuity on a 5-point scale.

Results: Fifty participants (male = 36, mean age 62 ± 11 years) were included for image analysis. The DL-based reconstruction showed significantly higher image quality than conventional images in all phases (3.71-4.40 vs 3.37-3.99, p < 0.001 for all), as well as significantly less noise and ringing artifacts than conventional images (p < 0.05 for all), while also showing significantly altered image texture (p < 0.001 for all). Lesion conspicuity was significantly higher in DL-reconstructed images than in conventional images in the arterial phase (2.15 [95% confidence interval: 1.78, 2.52] vs 2.03 [1.65, 2.40], p = 0.036), but no significant difference was observed in the portal venous phase and hepatobiliary phase (p > 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in the figure-of-merit (0.728 in DL vs 0.709 in conventional image, p = 0.474).

Conclusion: DL reconstruction provided higher-quality three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging than conventional reconstruction in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Critical Relevance Statement: DL reconstruction of 3D T1-weighted images improves image quality and arterial phase lesion conspicuity in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI compared to conventional reconstruction.

Key Points: DL reconstruction is feasible for 3D T1-weighted images across different spatial resolutions and phases. DL reconstruction showed superior image quality with reduced noise and ringing artifacts. Hepatic anatomic structures were more conspicuous on DL-reconstructed images.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519238PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01825-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
16
quality lesion
12
lesion conspicuity
12
gadoxetic acid-enhanced
12
acid-enhanced liver
12
liver mri
12
conspicuity conventional
8
conventional deep
8
deep learning
8
t1-weighted images
8

Similar Publications