98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Odontoid process fractures, particularly type 2 fractures, pose significant treatment challenges due to their high rates of nonunion. Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) is traditionally performed using percutaneous methods with biplanar fluoroscopy. Computer-assisted navigation has emerged as a promising tool to enhance surgical precision, but its application in AOSF is rarely utilized. Cervical spine stability during AOSF is crucial for optimal outcomes and navigational accuracy.
Case Description: A 64-year-old male presents with a displaced type 2 odontoid fracture following a fall. The fracture was treated with AOSF with the assistance of computed tomography (CT) navigation. A practical positioning technique employing a pressure infusion bag was introduced to stabilize cervical motion during surgery. This technique allows for precise instrumentation while minimizing the risk of navigational inaccuracy. Intraoperative imaging confirmed excellent fracture reduction and screw placement, facilitating a favorable surgical outcome.
Conclusions: CT navigation for AOSF is not yet widely adopted for the treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures due to inherent risks of fracture displacement, navigational inaccuracy, and iatrogenic injury. The off-label use of a pressure infusion bag for cervical stabilization offers a practical and cost-effective solution to enhance surgical precision. While further research is needed to compare the efficacy and radiation exposure of navigation-guided versus fluoroscopy-assisted AOSF, our report demonstrates that a safe and optimal outcome can be achieved using navigation-guided techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467271 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-46 | DOI Listing |
Clin Spine Surg
August 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.
Summary Of Background Data: Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly.
Asian Spine J
August 2025
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Purpose: We assessed the predisposition to type II odontoid fractures (T2OFs) in elderly people by comparing patients who had T2OFs with those who had sub-axial fractures.
Overview Of Literature: T2OFs are common among elderly people; osteoporosis and degenerative changes in the upper cervical spine are major risk factors.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
July 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Background And Objectives: Odontoid fractures are often managed surgically. The most common approaches are anterior dens screw (ADS) and posterior arthrodesis (PA), with the latter being associated with significantly higher fusion rates. PA techniques can include wiring, C1-C2 transarticular (TA) screws, and C1 lateral mass (LM)-C2 pars/pedicle screws.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniovertebr Junction Spine
July 2025
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Introduction: The options for the management of type II odontoid fractures in young patients include anterior screw fixation, posterior spinal fusion, or halo-vest immobilization (HVI). However, there is a recent trend away from nonoperative management and an increase in primary operative stabilization across several centers. Hence, our study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of type II odontoid fractures in young patients managed with HVI and surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurosurgery
July 2025
Bowers Neurosurgical Frailty and Outcomes Data Science Lab, Flint, Michigan, USA.
Background And Objectives: Type II odontoid fractures (T2OF) are the most prevalent cervical spine injuries among the elderly. Nonetheless, there are insufficient data regarding the influence of frailty on outcomes for both nonoperative and operative treatment approaches. We sought to evaluate the influence of frailty on outcomes using 5-factor modified frailty index.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF