Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: This study aimed to provide evidence on the harm-to-benefit ratio of fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by previous fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb) concentrations, as reflected in the number needed to screen (NNS) and number needed to scope (NNSc).

Methods: Participants in up to 4 FIT screening rounds of the Dutch CRC screening program were included. The main outcomes of this study were the NNS and NNSc to detect 1 CRC and/or advanced neoplasia (AN) in screening rounds 2, 3, or 4, conditional on previous f-Hb concentrations. Outcomes were compared between participants using chi-square tests and logistic regression.

Results: In total, 2,428,883 study participants completed at least 2 consecutive FITs, 1,308,684 completed 3 FITs, and 150,958 completed 4 FITs. There were 31,400, 16,060, and 2007 ANs detected by round, respectively. The NNS for individuals with vs without a history of detectable f-Hb differed significantly irrespective of screening round. Individuals without detectable f-Hb in previous negative FITs had almost 9 times the NNS to detect 1 AN compared with those with detectable f-Hb (odds ratio, 8.71; 95% confidence interval, 8.51-8.92). A similar directional pattern was observed for NNSc, although the differences were smaller (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-2.8).

Conclusions: The harm-to-benefit ratio of FIT-based screening is substantially greater in individuals without vs with prior detectable f-Hb. Less intensive screening should be considered for this lower-risk group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.08.041DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

detectable f-hb
16
harm-to-benefit ratio
12
ratio fecal
8
fecal immunochemical
8
screening
8
colorectal cancer
8
fecal hemoglobin
8
crc screening
8
f-hb concentrations
8
number needed
8

Similar Publications

While colorectal cancer screening is well-established in the UK, at present, it uses a 'one-size fits-all' approach - that is, individual risk is not considered when determining screening regimens (except for some specific conditions such as Lynch syndrome). Stratified screening offers the prospect of directing more intensive screening toward those at higher risk - with a corresponding reduction of screening intensity among lower-risk individuals. Two key opportunities for stratifying colorectal cancer screening are (1) making better use of an individual's quantitative fecal hemoglobin result rather than the current approach of deeming tests to be positive over an arbitrary threshold and (2) gathering information on lifestyle, family history, genetics and other factors to establish risk of colorectal cancer - and using this information to tailor screening regimens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) has become an alternative to traditional colonoscopy for low-risk patients. However, CCE's low completion rate and inability to take biopsies or remove polyps often result in a CCE-to-conventional colonoscopy conversion (CCC).

Objective(s): The aim is to identify the factors that predict issues with bowel cleansing, capsule excretion rates, pathology detection, and the need for CCC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To analyze the hematological characteristics of patients with three common deletional β-thalassemia and concomitant α-thalassemia in Huizhou, Guangdong province.

Methods: A total of 1 335 subjects of childbearing age with hemoglobin F (Hb F) ≥ 5% at the Huizhou First Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between June 2014 and December 2023 were enrolled as our study cohort. The hematological parameters were determined by blood cell counters and automatic capillary electrophoresis, while liquid phase chip and gap-PCR were employed for the detection of routine thalassemias and the three common deletional β-thalassemia, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In primary care, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence suspected cancer guidelines recommend measuring faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) if colorectal cancer (CRC) is suspected, with a referral threshold of ≥10 µg Hb/g faeces defining a 3% risk, but most have a normal colonoscopy.

Objective: Examine whether combining f-Hb, patient age and iron-deficient anaemia (IDA) status improves risk prediction.

Design: Retrospective single-centre observational study of symptomatic patients who submitted contemporaneous f-Hb and full blood count (FBC) samples between December 2015 and December 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

COLOFIT: Development and Internal-External Validation of Models Using Age, Sex, Faecal Immunochemical and Blood Tests to Optimise Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer in Symptomatic Patients.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther

March 2025

Gastrointestinal and Liver Theme, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United Kingdom and the second largest cause of cancer death.

Aim: To develop and validate a model using available information at the time of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in primary care to improve selection of symptomatic patients for CRC investigations.

Methods: We included all adults (≥ 18 years) referred to Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust between 2018 and 2022 with symptoms of suspected CRC who had a FIT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF