Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the adequate ovarian follicular development and oocyte recovery between ovarian potential (antral follicle count [AFC]) before the start of ovarian stimulation (OS) and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. A holistic overview of the current key performance indicators (KPIs) was applied to identify the complementary strengths and identify where the current repertoire can be expanded.

Design: Expert opinion.

Intervention: None.

Main Outcome Measures: To formulate a proposal for a refined and expanded repertoire of KPIs for individualized OS for assisted reproductive technology.

Results: The performance and outcomes of OS on ovarian follicular development can be evaluated through the application of defined KPIs. Current KPIs for OS are the ovarian sensitivity index, follicular output rate (FORT), oocyte retrieval rate, and follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI). Notably, there are no specific KPIs dedicated to the assessment of follicular development (i.e., recruitment, selection, growth, and dominance). In light of this, we recommend expanding the current KPIs for OS to include "early FORT" (accounting for the number of follicles measuring ≥10 to 11 mm on day 5/6 of OS relative to AFC) and "modified FORT" (the ratio between the number of follicles measuring ≥12 mm at the time of oocyte maturation triggering and AFC); the extension of oocyte retrieval rate to include two discrete categories at oocyte retrieval-follicles measuring ≥12 mm and ≥16 mm-to ensure that all responsive follicles are accounted for; and FOI to be measured at oocyte maturation triggering and oocyte retrieval ("advanced FOI").

Conclusion: Once validated and adopted in clinical practice, we envisage that the proposed expanded KPIs measuring the effect of OS on follicular development (recruitment, selection, growth, and dominance) will increase the understanding of the relationship between ovarian reserve, measured by AFC, and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. This understanding will enable physicians to better evaluate the direct effect of different gonadotropins and doses on ovarian response, leading to a more personalized approach to OS in the context of assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oocyte retrieval
20
follicular development
16
assisted reproductive
12
oocyte
11
key performance
8
performance indicators
8
ovarian
8
ovarian stimulation
8
reproductive technology
8
ovarian follicular
8

Similar Publications

Study Question: Can patient age and ovarian reserve tests predict the number of cryopreserved oocytes in patients undergoing one or more ovarian stimulation cycles for elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC)?

Summary Answer: A predictive model incorporating patient age, antral follicle count (AFC), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and FSH levels achieved the greatest predictive accuracy.

What Is Known Already: As a consequence of societal evolution, women are increasingly delaying starting a family. However, the natural decline in ovarian reserve and oocyte quality as age advances can increase the risk of age-related fertility decline (ARFD) and involuntary childlessness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Question: Do IVF laboratory workflows influence the mean blastulation rate per cohort of inseminated metaphase II oocytes (m-BR)?

Summary Answer: Neither the total number of procedures nor the workload per operator affected m-BR; instead, each additional hour in the interval from ovulation trigger to oocyte denudation (range 36-44 h) was associated with a measurable decline, especially beyond the 40-h threshold.

What Is Known Already: Control of laboratory conditions and standardized protocols are essential for optimizing m-BR in IVF. While advancements in technology and culture systems have improved ART outcomes, the effect of laboratory managerial decisions and procedural timing on embryological outcomes remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The management of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in predicted hyper-responders to ovarian stimulation represents a complex and challenging clinical scenario, whereby the benefits of higher oocyte yield must be balanced against the drawbacks and risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This review explores advances in ART for hyper-responders, focusing on adapted stimulation protocols, ovulation triggering, cryopreservation, and personalized strategies to optimize outcomes. In-vitro maturation of oocytes, an emerging alternative, is gaining traction for increasing live birth rates in selected cases and expert centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent advancements in genomic technology have increased interest in using calves as oocyte sources through the laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) method, which shortens generation intervals and enhances genetic gain. This study aimed to produce embryos in vitro using oocytes from endangered Anatolian Native Black calves and to increase the number of embryos in the gene bank through LOPU, a method not previously studied in Turkey. Four Anatolian Native Black calves, approximately 3 months old, were used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the relationship between leading follicle size at the time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger and live birth rates in Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) groups 3 and 4 undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles using a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The objective was to identify the optimal leading follicle size for maximizing live birth outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Material And Methods: This retrospective cohort study included POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 poor responders aged 20-42 years undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with GnRH antagonist protocol between January 2015 and July 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF