Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: In 2022, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released proposed changes to Medicare's continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) coverage policy, making individuals with a history of problematic hypoglycaemia eligible for CGM coverage, irrespective of insulin use. This study estimated the burden of hypoglycaemia in Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analysed US healthcare claims data using Optum's deidentified Clinformatics® database. Noninsulin-treated beneficiaries were identified in the 16 years from January 2007 to March 2023. Hypoglycaemia-related encounters (HREs) were those accompanied by a hypoglycaemia-specific ICD-9/10 diagnosis code in any position on the claim or the first or second position. HREs following the first claim related to T2D were reported by setting (ambulatory or inpatient/emergency department [ED]).

Results: HREs were identified in 689,853 (21.4%) of 3,229,695 noninsulin-treated Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, of whom 82.9% (n = 571,581) had ≥1 HRE in an ambulatory location and 26.8% (n = 184,833) in an ED/inpatient location. Use of sulfonylurea (odds ratio [OR]: 4.33 confidence interval [CI: 4.27-4.38]), evidence of end-stage kidney disease (OR: 2.87 [CI: 2.79-2.94]), hypertension (OR: 3.09 [CI: 3.04-3.15]) and retinopathy (OR: 2.94 [CI: 2.82-3.07]) were the strongest predictors of an HRE (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These findings show that HREs are prevalent in noninsulin-treated diabetes and identify a large number of patients who may benefit from CGM. Because >80% of HREs occur in the ambulatory setting and >70% occur in patients not taking sulfonylureas, primary care providers should be aware of the latest eligibility criteria for Medicare's coverage of CGM and not restrict this technology to their sulfonylurea-treated patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.15982DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicare advantage
12
advantage beneficiaries
12
type diabetes
8
cgm coverage
8
risk hypoglycaemia
4
hypoglycaemia people
4
people type
4
diabetes treated
4
treated insulin
4
insulin retrospective
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Hospitals have reported growing difficulty in discharging patients in a timely manner, often citing bottlenecks in postacute care. Medicare Advantage plans, now the dominant form of Medicare coverage, may contribute to these delays due to administrative and network constraints, yet national evidence is lacking.

Objective: To quantify changes in hospital length of stay for Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare beneficiaries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Do MA plans follow incentives to attract enrollee groups with new supplemental benefits?

Health Aff Sch

September 2025

Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.

Introduction: The Medicare Advantage (MA) payment system gives rise to incentives for plans to attract and retain beneficiaries from minoritized racial and ethnic groups and those dually eligible for Medicaid (duals) by offering these groups additional benefits.

Methods: We examined how MA plans respond to these incentives using a 2020 policy change that granted broader flexibility in benefit design, allowing plans to offer Special Supplemental Benefits for the Chronically Ill (SSBCI).

Results: We found that plans with higher shares of patients from these groups were more likely to offer SSBCI benefits: a 1 SD increase in a plan's non-White share was associated with a 20.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults who are not Medicare eligible while leaving in place states' more restrictive dual eligibility criteria. When Medicaid expansion enrollees turn 65 and transition to Medicare as their primary insurer, they may lose Medicaid and face higher premiums and out-of-pocket costs, yet there is little understanding of how older adults navigate this change in insurance programs.

Objective: To investigate the experiences of Medicaid expansion enrollees who transitioned to Medicare coverage at age 65.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Medicare Advantage (MA) plan selection may differ between older adults with or without dementia in unexplored ways. This study aims to characterize MA plan choice among those with dementia.

Methods: We used the 2010 to 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study with linked Medicare enrollment data to identify MA respondents ≥ 65 years, with and without dementia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF