Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Anastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS).

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644.

Results: Five observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09-1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33-1.84; p = 0.57); respectively.

Conclusion: The use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436432PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04729-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

circular stapler
12
powered circular
8
left-sided colic
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
stapler colorectal
4
colorectal anastomosis
4
anastomosis left-sided
4
colic resection
4
resection systematic
4

Similar Publications

A comparative clinical outcome study of power-assisted vs. manually-operated circular staplers for deep colorectal anastomosis.

BMC Surg

August 2025

Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant, Unité de Chirurgie Colo-rectale, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de la République, Chambray- Les-Tours, France.

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the perioperative clinical outcomes between power-assisted circular staplers (PCS) and manually-operated circular staplers (MCS) with directional stapling technology (DST) for deep colorectal anastomoses.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 64 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for low colorectal anastomosis (< 7 cm from the anal verge) between February 2020 and December 2022 at a tertiary referral center for colorectal surgery at the University Hospital of Tours, France. Patients were divided into two groups according to the stapler used: PCS group II; (n = 35) and MCS (group I; n = 29).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) still poses certain technical challenges today, especially in performing esophagojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric resection, as this procedure demands high technical expertise and is considered difficult. Currently, digestive tract reconstruction methods after LTG involve two main types of anastomosis: circular stapler anastomosis and linear stapler anastomosis. Circular stapler anastomosis is considered the "gold standard" for esophagojejunostomy in open total gastrectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study in Powered and Manual Stapler in Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer.

Asian J Endosc Surg

August 2025

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Background: Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most serious complications following low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. While powered circular staplers (PCS) have been introduced to improve surgical consistency and reduce technical errors, their clinical superiority over manual circular staplers (MCS) remains unclear.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2022 to April 2025, enrolling 179 patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer scheduled for LAR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Currently, there is no standardized finite element analysis method for investigating the safe compression range of circular end-to-end anastomosis stapler. This study aims to develop a finite element analysis framework based on stress thresholds and the volumetric distribution of tissue states, and to investigate the effects of tissue thickness and compression ratio on the risk of compression-induced injury during anastomosis. The evaluation is conducted by calculating the proportion of the volume of elements categorized as "effective fixation" or "damaged" based on equivalent stress.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF