A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Surgical Management of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Survey of Current Practice and Literature Review. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction Irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a complex challenge encountered by shoulder surgeons. Despite a range of repair strategies, the preferences and indications of these remain unclear. Our study aims to identify current practices, preference for graft choice and indications for capsular reconstruction amongst UK-based surgeons. Methods An online survey was sent to members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Procedural preferences, operative frequency, indications/contra-indications for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and graft choice were ascertained. An independent t-test was used to determine statistical significance. Results One hundred and ten upper limb surgeons responded to the survey. Of this cohort, 90/110 (81.8%) would be able to perform a partial cuff repair, 89/110 (80.9%) could offer a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and 82/110 (74.6%) could perform debridement only. Less commonly, 35/110 (31.8%) could offer an Inspace balloon device, 31/110 (28.2%) SCR and 16/110 (14.6%) a tendon transfer. None of the respondents had performed more than 10 Inspace balloons in the previous year. 72/105 (68.6%) had never performed a SCR and 86/105 (82%) had never performed a tendon transfer. Over 58/105 (55.2%) had performed >10 RSA in the previous year. The graft of choice for SCR was human dermal allograft 33/100 (33%) and this choice was most frequently guided by surgeon preference. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that various treatment options can be offered for the management of irreparable RCTs. The commonest procedure offered is a partial cuff repair followed by RSA. Newer, novel procedures such as Inspace balloon and tendon transfers are less commonly offered in UK-based practices and their indications for use are less well defined. Future high-powered, multi-centre studies are required to identify the role and outcomes of these procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425768PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.67907DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

graft choice
12
management irreparable
8
irreparable rotator
8
rotator cuff
8
cuff tears
8
capsular reconstruction
8
partial cuff
8
cuff repair
8
inspace balloon
8
tendon transfer
8

Similar Publications