Bayesian analyses of multiple random change points in survival models with applications to clinical trials.

J Biopharm Stat

Department of Biostatistics, Research Data Consulting, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA.

Published: September 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Single and multiple random change points (RCPs) in survival analysis have arisen naturally in oncology trials, where the time to hazard rate change differs from one subject to another. Recently, Xu formulated and discovered important properties of these survival models using a frequentist approach, allowing us to estimate the hazard rates, rate parameters of the exponential distributions for the RCPs, expected survival and hazard functions. However, these methods did not provide an estimation of the uncertainty or the confidence intervals for the parameters and their differences or ratios. Therefore, statistical inferences were not able to be drawn on the parameters and their comparisons. To solve this issue, this article implements a Gibbs sampler method to estimate the above parameters and the differences or ratios alongside the 100(1 )% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals calculated from Chen-Shao's algorithm. The estimated rate parameters from the methods in Xu serve as empirical values in the Gibbs sampler method. Thus, formal statistical inferences can now be readily drawn. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed methods yield robust estimates, with the samples from the marginal posterior distributions converging rapidly and exhibiting favorable behavior. The 95% HPD intervals also demonstrate excellent coverage probabilities. This proposed method has a multitude of applications in clinical trials such as efficient clinical trial design and sample size adjustment based on the estimated parameter values at interim analyses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2395542DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multiple random
8
random change
8
change points
8
survival models
8
applications clinical
8
clinical trials
8
rate parameters
8
parameters differences
8
differences ratios
8
statistical inferences
8

Similar Publications

This study investigated the impact of dietary zeolite supplementation on growth, cecal microbiota and digesta viscosity, digestive enzymes, carcass traits, blood constituents, and antioxidant parameters of broilers. A completely randomized design was used with 240 one-day-old broiler chicks randomly assigned to three dietary treatments (0%, 1.5%, and 3% zeolite as a feed additive) with four replicates of 20 chicks each.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Physical inactivity, impaired physical mobility and poor mental health are common in the older population and increasing as the population ages. We examined the relationships between physical activity, physical mobility, and mental health in the general population of older adults.

Methods: The study is based on 12 959 men and women aged 70 years or older answering a survey questionnaire sent to a random population sample in Mid-Sweden in 2022 (response rate 66%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Avenanthramides (AVAs) and Avenacosides (AVEs) are unique to oats (Avena Sativa) and may serve as biomarkers of oat intake. However, information regarding their validity as food intake biomarkers is missing. We aimed to investigate critical validation parameters such as half-lives, dose-response, matrix effects, relative bioavailability under single dose, and in relation to the abundance of Feacalibacterium prausnitzii, and under repeated dosing, to understand the potential applications of AVAs and AVEs as biomarkers of oat intake.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Frailty, often linked to sarcopenia, involves reduced muscle strength and mass. While sarcopenia has multiple causes, impaired muscle protein synthesis may contribute. Leucine and resistance training (RT) are anabolic stimuli, but the long-term effects of leucine combined with RT in pre/frail older women remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer screening nonadherence persists among adults who are deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing (DDBHH). These barriers span individual, clinician, and health care system levels, contributing to difficulties understanding cancer information, accessing screening services, and following treatment directives. Critical communication barriers include ineffective patient-physician communication, limited access to American Sign Language (ASL) cancer information, misconceptions about medical procedures, insurance navigation difficulties, and intersectional barriers for multiply marginalized individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF