[Clinical application study of midline catheter in vasopressor therapy].

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Fenyang Hospital, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, China. Corresponding author: Guo Chaoli, Email:

Published: July 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and necessity of vasopressor infusion through midline catheter.

Methods: A convenient sampling method was used for a controlled study. A total of 88 adult patients who used vasopressors admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Fenyang Hospital in Shanxi Province from June 2022 to June 2023 were enrolled as the research subjects. A total of 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) from June to December 2022 were enrolled as the PICC group, and 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through midline catheter from January to June 2023 were enrolled as the midline catheter group. Both groups of patients used the modified Sedinger technique under the guidance of B-ultrasound for puncture and catheter placement. The middle 1/3 site between the cubital fossa and the axilla was selected. The catheters were 5 Fr double lumen. After catheter placement, the patients were followed until catheter removal, death, or 30 days (whichever came first). Based on the Infusion therapy standards of practice revised by American Infusion Nurses Society (INS), and combined with the results of previous preliminary tests, the safety evaluation was conducted on incomplete catheter obstruction, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), phlebitis, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection), and exudation of the puncture site in the two groups of patients.

Results: There were no statistical differences in gender, age, catheter indwelling time, and primary disease between the two groups, indicating that the baseline data of the two groups were balanced and comparable. No CRBSI or phlebitis occurred in both groups during the observation period after catheterization. One patient in both groups had exudation at the puncture site [both were 2.27% (1/44)]. Compared with the PICC group, the incidence of incomplete catheter obstruction, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection) in the midline catheter group were lowered [incomplete catheter obstruction: 4.55% (2/44) vs. 6.82% (3/44), thrombus within the catheter during extubation: 0% (0/44) vs. 2.27% (1/44), redness of the puncture site (but no infection): 0% (0/44) vs. 4.55% (2/44)], the overall incidence was significantly decreased [6.82% (3/44) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.01].

Conclusions: Administering vasopressor through a midline catheter can reduce the incidence of catheter-related complications, decrease the rate of central venous catheterization, and reduce the financial burden on patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240326-00286DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

midline catheter
20
puncture site
20
catheter
16
catheter obstruction
12
thrombus catheter
12
catheter extubation
12
redness puncture
12
site infection
12
june 2023
8
2023 enrolled
8

Similar Publications

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters are widely utilized for intravenous treatment in home care settings. Despite their similar appearance, these devices differ significantly due to the tip location, which influences the types of infusions that can be safely administered. It is important for home care nurses to have a comprehensive understanding of these differences to ensure safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

PurposeMidline catheters (ML) are long peripheral intravenous catheters placed in an upper extremity above the antecubital fossa via the basilic, cephalic, or brachial veins. These provide safe and comfortable long-term vascular access for critically ill patients. Central venous pressures (CVP) are obtained from central venous catheters (CVC) and are often used as resuscitation parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Midline catheters (MCs) longer than 15 cm are increasingly used for intravenous therapy. However, a consensus on the safe administration of irritating infusates (pH <5 or >9, osmolality >900 mOsm/L) is lacking. The current guidelines do not specify how the catheter tip position (axillary vein of the chest wall or subclavian vein) modulates the complication risks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe obesity, however, reliable vascular access during the perioperative period remains a challenge in this population. This study compared the safety and efficacy of midline catheters (MCs) and long peripheral catheters (LPCs) in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. This single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary acute hospital between September 2023 and January 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF