98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To evaluate the safety and necessity of vasopressor infusion through midline catheter.
Methods: A convenient sampling method was used for a controlled study. A total of 88 adult patients who used vasopressors admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Fenyang Hospital in Shanxi Province from June 2022 to June 2023 were enrolled as the research subjects. A total of 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) from June to December 2022 were enrolled as the PICC group, and 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through midline catheter from January to June 2023 were enrolled as the midline catheter group. Both groups of patients used the modified Sedinger technique under the guidance of B-ultrasound for puncture and catheter placement. The middle 1/3 site between the cubital fossa and the axilla was selected. The catheters were 5 Fr double lumen. After catheter placement, the patients were followed until catheter removal, death, or 30 days (whichever came first). Based on the Infusion therapy standards of practice revised by American Infusion Nurses Society (INS), and combined with the results of previous preliminary tests, the safety evaluation was conducted on incomplete catheter obstruction, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), phlebitis, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection), and exudation of the puncture site in the two groups of patients.
Results: There were no statistical differences in gender, age, catheter indwelling time, and primary disease between the two groups, indicating that the baseline data of the two groups were balanced and comparable. No CRBSI or phlebitis occurred in both groups during the observation period after catheterization. One patient in both groups had exudation at the puncture site [both were 2.27% (1/44)]. Compared with the PICC group, the incidence of incomplete catheter obstruction, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection) in the midline catheter group were lowered [incomplete catheter obstruction: 4.55% (2/44) vs. 6.82% (3/44), thrombus within the catheter during extubation: 0% (0/44) vs. 2.27% (1/44), redness of the puncture site (but no infection): 0% (0/44) vs. 4.55% (2/44)], the overall incidence was significantly decreased [6.82% (3/44) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.01].
Conclusions: Administering vasopressor through a midline catheter can reduce the incidence of catheter-related complications, decrease the rate of central venous catheterization, and reduce the financial burden on patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240326-00286 | DOI Listing |
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters are widely utilized for intravenous treatment in home care settings. Despite their similar appearance, these devices differ significantly due to the tip location, which influences the types of infusions that can be safely administered. It is important for home care nurses to have a comprehensive understanding of these differences to ensure safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Intensive Care Med
September 2025
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
PurposeMidline catheters (ML) are long peripheral intravenous catheters placed in an upper extremity above the antecubital fossa via the basilic, cephalic, or brachial veins. These provide safe and comfortable long-term vascular access for critically ill patients. Central venous pressures (CVP) are obtained from central venous catheters (CVC) and are often used as resuscitation parameters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
August 2025
Department of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Introduction: Midline catheters (MCs) longer than 15 cm are increasingly used for intravenous therapy. However, a consensus on the safe administration of irritating infusates (pH <5 or >9, osmolality >900 mOsm/L) is lacking. The current guidelines do not specify how the catheter tip position (axillary vein of the chest wall or subclavian vein) modulates the complication risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
August 2025
Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, China.
Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe obesity, however, reliable vascular access during the perioperative period remains a challenge in this population. This study compared the safety and efficacy of midline catheters (MCs) and long peripheral catheters (LPCs) in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. This single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary acute hospital between September 2023 and January 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF