A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Impact of permanent pacemaker for iatrogenic atrioventricular block on outcomes after congenital heart surgery. | LitMetric

Impact of permanent pacemaker for iatrogenic atrioventricular block on outcomes after congenital heart surgery.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address:

Published: February 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) for iatrogenic atrioventricular block (AVB) after congenital heart surgery is approximately 1%. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with PPM for iatrogenic AVB and compare them with patients with an optimal repair (trivial/no residual) Residual Lesion Score (RLS) Class 1 repair without PPM need.

Methods: We reviewed 183 patients discharged with PPM for iatrogenic AVB from 2011 to 2022. Patients who survived to discharge with >30 days of follow-up were matched 1:1 with a cohort of patients categorized as RLS Class 1 on the basis of fundamental diagnosis and primary procedure.

Results: Median age at PPM placement was 1.4 years (interquartile range, 4.3 months to 3.9 years). The cumulative incidence of moderate or greater ventricular dysfunction at 1 year and 5 years was 11% and 18% in patients with PPM, respectively, compared with 3% and 7% in patients categorized as RLS Class 1 (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.1; P = .022). Independently, patients with PPM with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (P = .027) and who had undergone Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Mortality Category 5 procedures (P = .033) were at greater risk of ventricular dysfunction. Transplant-free survival at 1 year and 5 years was 94% and 89% in patients with PPM, respectively, compared with 98% and 97% in patients categorized as RLS Class 1 (P = .044). In addition, patients with PPM with palliated circulation had significantly lower transplant-free survival (P < .001).

Conclusions: Compared with patients with an optimal repair without PPM, patients with PPM for iatrogenic AVB are at greater risk of developing moderate or greater ventricular dysfunction and have lower transplant-free survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.08.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients ppm
20
rls class
16
ppm iatrogenic
12
patients categorized
12
categorized rls
12
patients
11
ppm
9
permanent pacemaker
8
iatrogenic atrioventricular
8
atrioventricular block
8

Similar Publications