98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The nucleus accumbens (NAc) mediates reward learning and motivation. Despite an abundance of neuropeptides, peptidergic neurotransmission from the NAc has not been integrated into current models of reward learning. The existence of a sparse population of neurons containing corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) has been previously documented. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of their identity and functional role in shaping reward learning.
Methods: Our multidisciplinary approach included fluorescent in situ hybridization (n = ≥3 mice), tract tracing (n = 5 mice), ex vivo electrophysiology (n = ≥30 cells), in vivo calcium imaging with fiber photometry (n = ≥4 mice), and use of viral strategies in transgenic lines to selectively delete CRF peptide from NAc neurons (n = ≥4 mice). Behaviors used were instrumental learning, sucrose preference, and spontaneous exploration in an open field.
Results: We showed that the vast majority of NAc CRF-containing neurons are spiny projection neurons (SPNs) comprising dopamine D-, D-, or D/D-containing SPNs that primarily project and connect to the ventral pallidum and to a lesser extent the ventral midbrain. As a population, they display mature and immature SPN firing properties. We demonstrated that NAc CRF-containing neurons track reward outcomes during operant reward learning and that CRF release from these neurons acts to constrain initial acquisition of action-outcome learning and at the same time facilitates flexibility in the face of changing contingencies.
Conclusions: CRF release from this sparse population of SPNs is critical for reward learning under normal conditions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839403 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.006 | DOI Listing |
J Exp Anal Behav
September 2025
Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Every day we encounter situations in which decisions require trade-offs between the delay to one reward and the likelihood of receiving another reward. The current study was designed to extend a general discounting framework to gain insights into this fundamental trade-off process. Forty-three undergraduates adjusted the probability of receiving an immediate hypothetical monetary reward (either $200 or $10,000) until that probabilistic reward was judged subjectively equal in value to the same reward received with certainty after a delay (ranging from 1 month to 25 years).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Biosci (Landmark Ed)
August 2025
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Glutamate is an important neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. Among the receptors that glutamate interacts with is metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor 2, a Gα-coupled receptor. These receptors are primarily located on glutamatergic nerve terminals and act as presynaptic autoreceptors to produce feedback inhibition of glutamate release.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychophysiology
September 2025
Department of Human Medicine, Institute for Systems Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with altered performance monitoring, reflected in enhanced amplitudes of the error-related negativity in the event-related potential. However, this is not specific to OCD, as overactive error processing is also evident in anxiety. Although similar neural mechanisms have been proposed for error and feedback processing, it remains unclear whether the processing of errors as indexed by external feedback, reflected in the feedback-related negativity (FRN), is altered in OCD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Anal Behav
September 2025
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cooperation involves an individual's choice that benefits both themself and others -in contrast to selfishness, which benefits the individual only-and has been suggested to be more likely when the benefit to others, discounted as a function of their social distance (i.e., social discounting), exceeds the undiscounted cost to the cooperator.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFConscious Cogn
September 2025
School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China; Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavior & Cognitive Neuroscience, Xi'an 710062, China. Electronic address:
Flexibly inhibiting inappropriate responses based on current goals and past experiences is crucial. The dual-mechanism of control (DMC) model proposes that cognitive control involves proactive (expectation-driven) and reactive (stimulus-driven, such as reward history) control. However, how these mechanisms interact during inhibitory control remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF