98%
921
2 minutes
20
Whole-heart 4D-flow MRI is a valuable tool for advanced visualization and quantification of blood flow in cardiovascular imaging. Despite advantages over 2D-phase-contrast flow, clinical implementation remains only partially exploited due to many hurdles in all steps, from image acquisition, reconstruction, postprocessing and analysis, clinical embedment, reporting, legislation, and regulation to data storage. The intent of this manuscript was 1) to evaluate the extent of clinical implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI, 2) to identify hurdles hampering clinical implementation, and 3) to reach consensus on requirements for clinical implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI. This study is based on Delphi analysis. This study involves a panel of 18 experts in the field on whole-heart 4D-flow MRI. The experience with and opinions of experts (mean 13 years of experience, interquartile range 6) in the field were aggregated. This study showed that among experts in the cardiovascular field, whole-heart 4D-flow MRI is currently used for both clinical and research purposes. Overall, the panelists agreed that major hurdles currently hamper implementation and utilization. The sequence-specific hurdles identified were long scan time and lack of standardization. Further hurdles included cumbersome and time-consuming segmentation and postprocessing. The study concludes that implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI in clinical routine is feasible, but the implementation process is complex and requires a dedicated, multidisciplinary team. A predefined plan, including risk assessment and technique validation, is essential. The reported consensus statements may guide further tool development and facilitate broader implementation and clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896919 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29550 | DOI Listing |
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
June 2025
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping, Sweden; Science for Life Laboratory, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Electronic address:
Background: Despite its potential to improve the assessment of cardiovascular diseases, four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is hampered by long scan times. 4D flow CMR is conventionally acquired with three motion encodings and one reference encoding, as the three-dimensional velocity data are obtained by subtracting the phase of the reference from the phase of the motion encodings. In this study, we aim to use deep learning to predict the reference encoding from the three motion encodings for cardiovascular 4D flow.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMagn Reson Imaging
June 2025
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ECRC Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany; Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Researc
Introduction: This study investigated intracardiac flow dynamics and assessed the comparability and reliability of 4D flow CMR measurements across multiple sites within the Berlin Research Network for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (BER-CMR) using 3D cine phase-contrast imaging with three-directional velocity encoding in a healthy traveling cohort.
Methods: In a prospective multi-site cohort study, 20 healthy volunteers underwent CMR at different sites. Quantitative assessment of Forward flow Volume (FFV), Peak (PV) and Mean Velocity (MV) across the heart's valves were conducted using retrospective valve tracking.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility of important biomarkers like wall shear stress (WSS), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and net flow across two 4D flow MRI imaging protocols with different coverages: aorta-targeted 4D flow MRI (AT4D) and whole-heart 4D flow (WH4D) protocols.
Methods: Thirty-eight control subjects (43.2 ± 10.
Diagnostics (Basel)
November 2024
Imaging and Phenotyping Laboratory, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Background: Accurate measurements of flow and ventricular volume and function are critical for clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the current gold standard for ventricular functional evaluation but is relatively expensive and time-consuming, thus limiting the scale of clinical applications. New volumetric acquisition techniques, such as four-dimensional flow (4D-flow) and three-dimensional volumetric cine (3D-cine) MRI, could potentially reduce acquisition time without loss in accuracy; however, this has not been formally tested on a large scale.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Magn Reson Imaging
April 2025
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.