98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation are intertwined concepts. When assessed separately, they indicate poor well-being, adverse health effects, and increased mortality. Studies exploring overlapping and comparing the prognosis of these concepts are scarce. We investigated (1) overlapping of concepts of loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation, (2) characteristics of groups: group 0 (not lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated), group 1 (lonely), group 2 (not lonely but socially inactive and/or socially isolated), and (3) the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological well-being (PWB), and 3.6-year mortality of these groups.
Methods: The home-dwelling older adults (n = 989; 75 y+) of the Helsinki Aging Study in 2019-2022 completing all required questionnaires were assessed. Group 0 included 494, group 1 included 280, and group 2 included 215 participants. Variables studied were demographics, diagnoses, mobility, physical functioning (Barthel index), and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination). Outcomes were HRQoL (15D) and PWB. Mortality was retrieved from central registers.
Results: Half of the sample was lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated, but only 2% were simultaneously lonely, socially inactive, and socially isolated. Of lonely participants, 38% were also socially inactive and/or socially isolated. The lonely participants were significantly more often widowed or lived alone and had the lowest HRQoL and poorest PWB compared with the other groups. After adjustments (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index), mortality did not statistically differ between the groups.
Conclusion: Loneliness is an independent determinant of poor HRQoL and PWB, and it should be considered separately from social inactivity and social isolation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000540345 | DOI Listing |
BMC Public Health
September 2025
Department of Social and Health Sciences in Sport, Bayreuth Center of Sport Science, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Background: Sedentary behavior (SB) and the absence of physical activity (PA) have become increasingly prevalent in modern societies due to changes in physical and social-environmental conditions, particularly in university students. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe and identify the prevalence and correlates of self-reported and accelerometer-determined SB and PA of German university students.
Methods: A convenience sample of 532 students participated in a questionnaire survey during the lecture period in the summer term 2018.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
September 2025
Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology School of Public Health, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Introduction: To examine the association of the number of controlled risk factors with the excess risk of severe metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Research Design And Methods: In this cohort study, a total of 307,688 participants from the UK Biobank were included. Participants with baseline type 2 diabetes were categorized according to the number of risk factors within the guideline-recommended ranges (diet, smoking, drinking, exercise, sedentary behavior, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol).
Front Sports Act Living
August 2025
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Introduction: The primary objectives of the present individualized randomized controlled trial were to increase physical activity (PA) and improve physical fitness.
Materials And Methods: 260 military employees around Finland participated. Two-thirds, (158), were randomized in the intervention and one-third, (101), in the control group.
BMJ Open
September 2025
Department for Life Quality Studies, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Rimini, Italy.
Objective: This study aims to analyse the barriers and facilitators towards an implementation of active breaks (ABs) intervention inside the workplace.
Methods: This study used a mixed-methods approach, incorporating virtual focus groups and an online questionnaire, conducted among the workers of Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna (Italy). A total of 30 participants (N=30), including administrative and academic staff, PhD candidates, specialised trainees and research fellows, were involved in the study.
Curr Opin Psychol
August 2025
Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address:
Despite growing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) efforts in organizations, many socially advantaged individuals remain inactive as potential allies. To understand why, the present article introduces willful ignorance-the conscious avoidance of knowledge about inequality-as a core psychological barrier to allyship. Reviewing and synthesizing insights from existing research, we show how two forms of willful ignorance manifest at work (passively overlook among the "left" and actively turn away among the "right" on the ideological spectrum) and propose the OTTER framework to address them: Observe, Think, Talk, Examine, and Reorient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF