A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

On-site evaluation of DGT passive sampling for quantitatively measuring per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in a river-estuary-sea water system. | LitMetric

On-site evaluation of DGT passive sampling for quantitatively measuring per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in a river-estuary-sea water system.

Water Res

CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai Shandong, 264003, PR China; Pinglu Canal and Beibu Gulf Coastal Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Guangxi, College of Marine Sc

Published: October 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The passive sampling technique of diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) is promising for monitoring emerging contaminants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It is urgent to evaluate the impacts of salinity and exposure time on DGT sampling before it can be set as a standard method. Herein, DGT sampler based on the binding gel of weak anion exchanger (WAX) resin was deployed in a representative water system of the Xiaoqing river-estuary-sea for representative sampling windows (<1 day to 28 days) with high pH (8.18 ± 0.04 to 8.51 ± 0.17) and wide ranges of salinity (0.95 ± 0.07‰ to 14.37 ± 3.92‰), total dissolved solids (1.20 ± 0.09 g/L to 15.29 ± 3.91 g/L) and dissolved organic matter (2.8-32 mg/L). The results showed that the WAX-DGT sampler exhibited good performance for most target PFAS except for short-chain perfluorocarboxylates (C ≤ 5) in 14 days. When the exposure time was over 14 days, biofouling of the sampler may deflect the mass accumulation of the PFAS in the sampler. Salinity played an important role in the mass binding of PFAS by DGT. The shorter the carbon chain of the compound, the greater the influence of the salinity. PFAS with carboxyl groups had greater affinities for the biofouled membrane filter than those with sulfonic groups. In the river-estuary-sea system, where PFAS concentrations changed dynamically, the temporal resolution of the monitoring strategy has been demonstrated to be more important than spatial resolution. DGT provided a better integral of PFAS exposure than grab sampling in the dynamic water system and offered equivalent sensitivity of grab sampling with exposure time <10 d and greater sensitivity with exposure time ≥10 d. Thus, DGT has the advantage of providing high temporal resolution monitoring. This study provided support for the standardization of the DGT technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122203DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

passive sampling
8
per- polyfluoroalkyl
8
polyfluoroalkyl substances
8
water system
8
on-site evaluation
4
dgt
4
evaluation dgt
4
dgt passive
4
sampling
4
sampling quantitatively
4

Similar Publications