A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Follow-up strategies in pediatric cholesteatoma: a systematic review. | LitMetric

Follow-up strategies in pediatric cholesteatoma: a systematic review.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Task Force of the Young Otolaryngologists of the Italian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (GOS), Rome, Italy.

Published: January 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature on the pediatric population surgically treated for cholesteatoma and describe the applied post-operative follow-up strategies.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Primary Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement recommendations. After running the selected search string in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, studies in English, reporting on surgically treated pediatric cholesteatoma patients (age younger or equal to 18 year-old) were retrieved. Both primary and revision cholesteatoma surgeries were included. Articles lacking specific data on post-surgical follow-up and case series with less than 10 patients were excluded.

Results: Nineteen papers, published between 2000 and 2023, were included for final analysis. Fourteen studies were retrospective and five prospective, for a total of 1319 patients and 1349 operated ears. Male to female ratio was 1.8:1, with a mean age at surgery of 10.4 years (range 1-18). The mean length of the follow-up after surgery was 4.4 ± 1.7 years (range 1-6.9). Clinical follow-up was detailed in 9 studies (47%) with otomicroscopy being the most common evaluation. In most articles (n = 8, 50%), MRI alone was utilized for radiological follow-up, while in 3 studies (19%), CT scans were employed exclusively. In 5 studies (31%), MRI was combined with CT scans. The timing of radiological investigations varied widely (ranging from 6 months to 3 years). A second-look strategy was reported in 14 studies (74%).

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of the follow-up strategies applied to pediatric patients after cholesteatoma surgery, both in terms of timing and types of investigations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08875-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
16
follow-up strategies
8
pediatric cholesteatoma
8
surgically treated
8
follow-up
7
studies
6
cholesteatoma
5
review
5
pediatric
4
strategies pediatric
4

Similar Publications