Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Breast conservation therapy is a widely accepted approach in treating breast cancer, yet the average re-excision rates are approximately 25% despite surgical advancements. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MarginProbe device uses radiofrequency spectroscopy for intraoperative margin assessment, potentially reducing re-excision rates. This study evaluated the effectiveness of MarginProbe in reducing re-excisions compared with standard of care (SOC).

Methods: A prospective cohort with MarginProbe usage during partial mastectomies from June 2019 to July 2023 (153 patients) was compared with a retrospective control group without the device from January 2015 to May 2019 (300 patients). Both groups underwent partial mastectomies performed by two breast surgeons. Positive margins were defined as tumor on ink for invasive cancers and within 2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Results: When control was used for patient demographics and tumor characteristics, the findings showed that MarginProbe significantly decreased the probability of re-excision by 58% (p < 0.001), although it led to a higher shave volume, with an average of 9.8 cc additional tissue removed compared with SOC (p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positivity was significantly associated with increased odds of re-excision (p = 0.036). MarginProbe demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 47.5%.

Conclusions: MarginProbe is an effective adjunct for intraoperative margin assessment to decrease re-excision rates. However, patient selection is paramount. Given its significant increase in shave volume, women with small breasts may be at higher risk for poor cosmesis. Surgeons should exercise clinical judgement when determining the suitability of MarginProbe use for patients undergoing breast conservation. Further research is necessary to refine MarginProbe's specificity and to optimize its clinical application.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15879-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

re-excision rates
8
partial mastectomies
8
evaluating marginprobe
4
marginprobe re-excisions
4
re-excisions partial
4
partial mastectomy
4
mastectomy single-institution
4
single-institution analysis
4
analysis background
4
background breast
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) results in reoperation in ∼20 % of cases due to positive margins, and a 7-13 % recurrence risk at 5 years persists despite negative margins and radiation. Enhancing margin treatment is critical to reducing local recurrence and improving survival.

Objective: To optimize and evaluate the performance of a Saline-coupled Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation (SIRA) device in producing uniform 1 cm ablations in lumpectomy cavities and compare it to prior-generation RFA technology in previous clinical studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Achieving optimal surgical margins is critical in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to reduce local recurrence (LR) and the need for re-excision. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of intraoperative margin optimization strategies on key surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent BCS.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, including six randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We conducted a prospective, phase II trial in which a radiation tumor bed boost was delivered preoperatively instead of the standard postoperative approach for breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that a preoperative boost would result in a lower rate of re-excision and a shorter duration of locoregional therapy compared with a postoperative boost.

Methods: Patients in this trial (NCT04871516) received a boost of 13.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF