Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is increasingly promoted for the treatment of all large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) to cure potential low-risk cancers (superficial submucosal invasion without additional high-risk histopathologic features). The effect of a universal en bloc strategy on oncologic outcomes for the treatment of LNPCPs in the right colon is unknown. We evaluated this in a large Western population.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients referred for endoscopic resection (ER) of LNPCPs was analyzed. Patients found to have cancer after ER and those referred directly to surgery were included. The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of right colon LNPCPs with low-risk cancer.

Results: Over 180 months until June 2023, 3294 sporadic right colon LNPCPs in 2956 patients were referred for ER at 7 sites (median size 30 [interquartile range 22.5-37.5] mm). A total of 63 (2.1%) patients were referred directly to surgery, and cancer was proven in 56 (88.9%). A total of 2851 (96.4%) of 2956 LNPCPs underwent ER (median size 35 [interquartile range 25-45] mm), of which 75 (2.6%) were cancers. The overall prevalence of cancer in the right colon was 4.4% (n = 131 of 2956). Detailed histopathologic analysis was possible in 115 (88%) of 131 cancers (71 after ER, 44 direct to surgery). After excluding missing histopathologic data, 23 (0.78%) of 2940 sporadic right colon LNPCPs were low-risk cancers.

Conclusions: The proportion of right colon LNPCPs referred for ER containing low-risk cancer amenable to endoscopic cure was <1%, in a large, multicenter Western cohort. A universal endoscopic submucosal dissection strategy for the management of right colon LNPCPs is unlikely to yield improved patient outcomes given the minimal impact on oncologic outcomes.

Clinicaltrials: gov, Numbers: NCT01368289, NCT02000141.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colon lnpcps
16
patients referred
12
low-risk cancer
8
lnpcps
8
referred directly
8
directly surgery
8
proportion colon
8
lnpcps low-risk
8
sporadic colon
8
median size
8

Similar Publications

Updates in the endoscopic management of colorectal polyps.

Indian J Gastroenterol

September 2025

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Endoscopic resection of pre-malignant polyps remains a cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention. This review provides an evidence-based analysis of the current approaches to endoscopic colorectal polyp management. Cold snare resection is recommended for small and diminutive polyps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is an established adverse event after EMR of large non-pedunculated colon polyps (LNPCPs). Although clipping is commonly used in clinical settings, particularly for LNPCPs and for patients on antithrombotic agents, the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping is not well studied.

Methods: We conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis comparing prophylactic clipping (PC) versus no clipping (NC) for DPPB over a 1-year time horizon using a Markov decision tree model based on pooled randomized controlled trial data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nonlifting large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (NL-LNPCPs) account for 15% of LNPCPs and are effectively managed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with adjunctive cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST). Recurrence rates >10% at surveillance colonoscopy are however a significant limitation. We aimed to compare the outcomes of CAST plus margin thermal ablation (MTA) versus CAST alone for NL-LNPCPs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diagnostic Accuracy of Referral Biopsy Compared to Optical Biopsy in Large Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps.

Dig Dis Sci

February 2025

Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, HaAliya HaShniya St 8, 3109601, Haifa, Israel.

Background: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) offers excellent efficacy and safety. Referral biopsies are commonly obtained prior to EMR despite their potential adverse effects. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of referral biopsy as compared with optical evaluations and the polyp's final pathology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background:  Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is succeeded by a 6-month surveillance endoscopy to evaluate the post-EMR scar for recurrence. Data from expert centers suggest that routine tattoo placement and scar biopsies can be omitted, but data from community hospitals are lacking.

Methods:  The agreement between optical assessment and histological confirmation by routine biopsies was evaluated in a post-hoc analysis of the STAR-LNPCP study (NTR7477), containing prospective data on 6-month post-EMR scar assessments in 30 Dutch community hospitals (October 2019 to May 2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF