98%
921
2 minutes
20
DNA replication is remarkably accurate with estimates of only a handful of mutations per human genome per cell division cycle. Replication stress caused by DNA lesions, transcription-replication conflicts, and other obstacles to the replication machinery must be efficiently overcome in ways that minimize errors and maximize completion of DNA synthesis. Replication fork reversal is one mechanism that helps cells tolerate replication stress. This process involves reannealing of parental template DNA strands and generation of a nascent-nascent DNA duplex. While fork reversal may be beneficial by facilitating DNA repair or template switching, it must be confined to the appropriate contexts to preserve genome stability. Many enzymes have been implicated in this process including ATP-dependent DNA translocases like SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, HLTF, and the helicase FBH1. In addition, the RAD51 recombinase is required. Many additional factors and regulatory activities also act to ensure reversal is beneficial instead of yielding undesirable outcomes. Finally, reversed forks must also be stabilized and often need to be restarted to complete DNA synthesis. Disruption or deregulation of fork reversal causes a variety of human diseases. In this review we will describe the latest models for reversal and key mechanisms of regulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877614 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103731 | DOI Listing |
FEMS Microbiol Rev
August 2025
Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CNB-CSIC, 3 Darwin St, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis provide well-studied models for understanding how bacteria manage DNA replication stress (RS). These bacteria employ various strategies to detect and stabilize stalled replication forks (RFs), circumvent or bypass lesions, resolve replication-transcription conflicts (RTCs), and resume replication. While central features of responses to RS are broadly conserved, distinct mechanisms have evolved to adapt to their complex environments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends Biochem Sci
August 2025
Biotech Research and Innovation Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address:
Lesions on DNA threaten the integrity of replicating genomes, necessitating DNA damage tolerance mechanisms to bypass these lesions and ensure complete duplication of the genome. Lesion bypass by DNA polymerases can occur through either translesion DNA synthesis, which directly synthesizes across the damage, or template switching, which uses the undamaged sister strand as a template to circumvent the lesion. These processes are facilitated by replication fork reversal and/or replication repriming mechanisms, which modulate the progression of the replication fork and its positioning relative to the lesion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDNA Repair (Amst)
August 2025
Guangdong Key Laboratory for Genome Stability & Disease Prevention and Carson International Cancer Center, Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen 518060, China. Electronic address:
S-palmitoylation is a dynamic post-translational lipid modification that regulates key cellular processes. It is mediated by aspartate-histidine-histidine-cysteine-family palmitoyltransferases (PATs) and reversed by acyl-protein thioesterases (APTs). This modification influences protein stability, function, subcellular trafficking, and membrane interactions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFbioRxiv
July 2025
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1.
The activating signal co-integrator 1 complex subunit 3 (ASCC3), the largest subunit of ASCC, is one of two Ski2-like helicases with duplicated helicase cassettes encoded by the human genome. ASCC3 has been implicated in transcriptional regulation, alkylation damage repair, and ribosome quality control. In addition, published proteomics studies suggest that ASCC3 is associated with stalled forks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Commun
August 2025
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
The DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms that allow cells to tolerate DNA replication stress are critically important for genome stability and cell viability. Using an unbiased genetic screen, we identify a role for the RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF25 in promoting DNA replication stress tolerance. In response to DNA replication stress, RNF25-deficient cells generate aberrantly high levels of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), accumulate in S-phase and show reduced mitotic entry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF