Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The BODY-Q is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure for comprehensive assessment of treatment outcomes specific to patients undergoing body contouring surgery (BCS). However, for the BODY-Q to be meaningfully interpreted and used in clinical practice, minimal important difference (MID) scores are needed. A MID is defined as the smallest change in outcome measure score that patients perceive as important.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine BODY-Q MID estimates for patients undergoing BCS to enhance the interpretability of the BODY-Q.

Methods: Data from an international, prospective cohort from Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland were included. Two distribution-based methods were used to estimate MID: 0.2 standard deviations of mean baseline scores and the mean standardized response change of BODY-Q scores from baseline to 3 years postoperatively.

Results: A total of 12,554 assessments from 3237 participants (mean age 42.5 ± 9.3 years; BMI 28.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were included. Baseline MID scores ranged from 1 to 5 on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) scales and 3 to 6 on the appearance scales. The estimated MID scores from baseline to 3-year follow-up ranged from 4 to 5 for HRQL and from 4 to 8 on the appearance scales.

Conclusions: The BODY-Q MID estimates from before BCS to 3 years postoperatively ranged from 4 to 8 and are recommended for interpretation of patients' BODY-Q scores, evaluation of treatment effects of different BCS procedures, and calculation of sample size for future studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565588PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae162DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body-q scores
12
mid scores
12
body contouring
8
contouring surgery
8
international prospective
8
prospective cohort
8
outcome measure
8
patients undergoing
8
body-q mid
8
mid estimates
8

Similar Publications

Massive weight loss after bariatric surgery frequently results in redundant abdominal skin that can compromise posture, gait, and joint biomechanics. This prospective study investigated the functional effects of circumferential lipoabdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients. Eighteen individuals (mean BMI 29.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients undergoing plastic surgery often have higher rates of psychiatric disorders, which may influence surgical outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

Methods: A retrospective review of patients with and without psychiatric comorbidities who underwent reduction mammoplasty or body contouring (panniculectomy and/or abdominoplasty) from 2016 to 2022 was conducted. Propensity-score matching considered age, BMI, ethnicity, bariatric surgery history, ptosis, and breast tissue mass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) significantly impairs quality of life and is frequently associated with diastasis recti abdominis (DRA), particularly in postpartum women. This study aims to evaluate the impact of lipoabdominoplasty with rectus muscle plication on LBP, core function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in women with DRA.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled female patients who underwent lipoabdominoplasty with rectus muscle plication in 2023 for DRA correction (2-10 cm).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate post-bariatric patients' intentions to undergo reconstructive plastic surgery in Brazil's public health system.

Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted between May 2022 and February 2023, contacted 539 post-bariatric patients (≥ one year post surgery) via telephone, of whom 150 completed an online survey. Participants assessed their interest in reconstructive surgery and completed the validated Body-Q instrument to evaluate body image, sexual function, and related outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients undergo abdominoplasty/panniculectomy following excessive weight loss and/or to improve abdominal appearance/shape. The authors aim to compare clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) following these procedures in patients with/without a history of weight loss surgery (WLS).

Methods: A single-center, single-surgeon retrospective review from 2015-2022 was performed examining patients who underwent abdominal contouring procedures with/without a history of WLS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF