98%
921
2 minutes
20
Since no uniform treatment protocol for pancreatic irreversible electroporation (IRE) exists, the heterogeneity throughout literature complicates the comparison of results. To reach agreement among experts, a consensus study was performed. Eleven experts, recruited according to predefined criteria regarding previous IRE publications, participated anonymously in three rounds of questionnaires according to a modified Delphi technique. Consensus was defined as having reached ≥80% agreement. Response rates were 100, 64, and 64% in rounds 1 to 3, respectively; consensus was reached in 93%. Pancreatic IRE should be considered for stage III pancreatic cancer and inoperable recurrent disease after previous local treatment. Absolute contraindications are ventricular arrhythmias, implantable stimulation devices, congestive heart failure NYHA class 4, and severe ascites. The inter-electrode distance should be 10 to 20 mm and the exposure length should be 15 mm. After 10 test pulses, 90 treatment pulses of 1,500 V/cm should be delivered continuously, with a 90-µs pulse length. The first postprocedural contrast-enhanced computed tomography should take place 1 month post-IRE, and then every 3 months. This article provides expert recommendations regarding patient selection, procedure, and follow-up for IRE treatment in pancreatic malignancies through a modified Delphi consensus study. Future studies should define the maximum tumor diameter, response evaluation criteria, and the optimal number of preoperative FOLFIRINOX cycles.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236456 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787164 | DOI Listing |
Breastfeed Med
September 2025
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
A breastfeeding-friendly city is one with a synchronous and enabling environment for breastfeeding. A scoping review and interviews with breastfeeding mothers identified numerous potential indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city. To determine a set of indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city through consensus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHigh Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Blood pressure variability (BPV), independent of mean BP, is an emerging predictor of cardiovascular risk and hypertension-mediated organ damage. However, its clinical utility remains limited due to the lack of clear guideline recommendations, leading to variability in physician practices. Using the modified Delphi method, this is the first Egyptian consensus to provide expert recommendations for integrating BPV in Egypt's resource-limited settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
The goal was to develop a pragmatic classification system for conditions associated with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), aiming to enhance diagnosis, management, education, and research of CPP. An international, multidisciplinary panel participated in a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi consensus. This panel included healthcare professionals, medical society representatives, experts, individuals with lived experience of pain, advocacy groups, researchers, educators, and journal editors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBraz J Otorhinolaryngol
September 2025
Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Faculdade Medicina, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Objectives: To standardize the necessary competencies for medical students related to Head and Neck Surgery.
Methods: The study was performed in 2025. The Delphi process was employed in its sequential phases: the selection of an expert panel; a structured questionnaire containing a preliminary list of potential competencies; the electronic distribution of the questionnaire to the experts, with options to "maintain", "remove", or "modify" the competencies and to suggest the inclusion of new competencies; a second round indicating "agree" or "disagree" for each reformulated or new competency; and the final consensus.
Hum Reprod
September 2025
Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Study Question: What information does an international group of professionals and egg donors consider relevant and morally necessary for prospective egg donors to provide valid informed consent?
Summary Answer: Participants considered 80% of all concrete information items (CIIs) to be relevant (e.g. all legal aspects) and 67% to be morally necessary.