98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia in Asia.
Methods: Between August 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular 6-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from nonintervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm preeclampsia ≥1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks.
Results: Overall, 88.04% (42 897 of 48 725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2919 of 3543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 0.91-2.77]). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.92]). In addition, it correlated with 54%, 55%, and 64% reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.93]), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22-0.92]), and perinatal death (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.91]), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events.
Conclusions: The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia on a global scale.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03941886.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472904 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069907 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
September 2025
Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research (ACWHR), Institute Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has reduced rates of cervical cancer. Research suggests that women with HPV, precancerous disease, and prior invasive treatments are at increased risk of preterm birth. This study aimed to determine if there is a reduction in adverse obstetric outcomes for HPV vaccinated women.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Med Res
September 2025
Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción Dr. Carlos Gual Castro Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City, Mexico. Electronic address:
In the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) paradigm, there is a clear link between an adverse prenatal environment and the development of non-hereditary diseases later in life. Exposure to intrauterine inflammation, for example, has been associated with several late-onset conditions, including neurological, cardiovascular, immune, and metabolic disorders. Moreover, maternal and fetal health are compromised under exacerbated inflammation, as it can result in spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, or intrauterine growth restriction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Technol Ther
September 2025
Disciplina de Obstetricia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
To assess the relationship between time in range (TIR), extrapolated from self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) measures, and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including singleton pregnancies that began antenatal care before 20 weeks of gestation and delivered live newborns without malformations between 2010 and 2019. Glycemic data from SMBG were categorized into TIR (63-140 mg/dL or 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynaecol Res
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Aim: This study aimed to investigate maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies among women aged50-54 and 55-59, to refine risk assessments and inform evidence-based counseling and perinatal management guidelines.
Methods: A nationwide registry maintained by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology identified pregnancies between January 2013 and December 2022. Analyses included women aged 45-59 years with assisted reproductive technology pregnancies, excluding triplet or higher-order multiple gestations.
Can J Public Health
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Objectives: Black-White disparities in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality highlight health inequities in several settings, yet such racial disparities in Canada are not well defined. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify the extent of epidemiologic evidence assessing Black-White disparities in maternal and neonatal health in Canada.
Methods: We included peer-reviewed epidemiologic studies which measured maternal or neonatal outcomes in Black versus White individuals in Canada.