98%
921
2 minutes
20
A meta-analysis of the clinical survival indicators, adverse reactions and safety of lenvatinib combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in treating liver cancer was conducted, providing objective and effective evidence for clinical use. The present study is anticipated to guide the clinical application of lenvatinib. In the current meta-analysis, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to September 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and single-arm trial studies related to the combined treatment of lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-ligand 1 (L1) inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were included, while published and unpublished literature on other study types, literature with incomplete or inadequate information, animal experiments, literature reviews and systematic studies were excluded. Data were processed using STATA 15.1. The pooled results showed that the objective response rate [ORR; odds ratio (OR), 3.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.13-5.30; P<0.001], disease control rate (DCR; OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.03-2.57; P=0.038) and partial response (PR; OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.17-6.70; P<0.001) of combined lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy were significantly higher than those of lenvatinib monotherapy. Additionally, subgroup analysis results showed that the DCR of combination therapy using lenvatinib and nivolumab was significantly higher than that of lenvatinib monotherapy (OR, 2.20; 95% CI; 1.07-4.51; P=0.032). The difference between combination therapy using lenvatinib and camrelizumab, and lenvatinib monotherapy was not significant. However, the complete response, stable disease, progression disease and incidence rate of adverse events between combination therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy were not significantly different. Compared with lenvatinib alone, lenvatinib combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved ORR, mainly PR, and DCR in patients with HCC. At present, lenvatinib is mainly combined with nivolumab to increase the DCR of lenvatinib monotherapy for HCC. In addition, the incidence rate of adverse reactions between combination therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy was not significantly different for HCC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129543 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14445 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open
September 2025
Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Background: Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with high tumour burden and portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) is usually associated with poor survival outcomes. Rapid tumour control usually benefits long-term outcomes, which could be hardly achieved by solely systematic targeted and immunotherapy in current guidelines. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is reported as an effective intervention for rapid decrease of tumour burden.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImmunotargets Ther
September 2025
Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficiency and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and lung metastasis.
Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, treatment-naive patients with advanced (BCLC stage C) HCC and lung metastases who received lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor - with or without HAIC - between January 2019 and January 2024 were reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups.
Front Oncol
August 2025
Department of Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy (RT+IO+T) versus immunotherapy plus targeted therapy alone (IO+T) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the limited prospective evidence supporting the integration of radiotherapy into systemic regimens, particularly in real-world populations with advanced disease, this study aims to clarify the clinical value of this multimodal approach.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 71 patients with unresectable HCC treated between 2020 and 2025.
Lancet Oncol
September 2025
Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Background: No standard treatment exists for patients with platinum-refractory advanced type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma. In the PECATI trial, we sought to assess the antitumour activity and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in this population.
Methods: In this single-arm phase 2 trial, we recruited participants from 11 hospitals in France, Italy, and Spain.
World J Gastroenterol
August 2025
Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Background: Primary liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ranks as the sixth most prevalent cancer globally and the third major cause of cancer-associated mortality. Despite the available immunotherapies and combined immunotherapy and targeted therapy, the prognosis for many patients remains dismal. Accurately identifying the appropriate patient cohorts is crucial for improving treatment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF