A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Recommendation of minimal distal tibial length for long axis coordinate system definitions. | LitMetric

Recommendation of minimal distal tibial length for long axis coordinate system definitions.

J Biomech

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 36 S Wasatch Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Electronic address:

Published: June 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Accurate anatomical coordinate systems for the foot and ankle are critical for interpreting their complex biomechanics. The tibial superior-inferior axis is crucial for analyzing joint kinematics, influencing bone motion analysis during gait using CT imaging and biplane fluoroscopy. However, the lack of consensus on how to define the tibial axis has led to variability in research, hindering generalizability. Even as advanced imaging techniques evolve, including biplane fluoroscopy and weightbearing CT, there exist limitations to imaging the entire foot together with the full length of the tibia. These limitations highlight the need to refine axis definitions. This study investigated various superior-inferior axes using multiple distal tibia lengths to determine the minimal field of view for representing the full tibia long-axis. Twenty human cadaver tibias were imaged and segmented to generate 3D bone models. Axes were calculated based on coordinate definitions that required user manual input, and a gold standard mean superior-inferior axis was calculated based on the population's principal component analysis axis. Four manually calculated superior-inferior tibial axes groups were established based on landmarks and geometric fittings. Statistical analysis revealed that geometrically fitting a cylinder 1.5 times the mediolateral tibial width, starting 5 cm above the tibial plafond, yielded the smallest angular deviation from the gold standard. From these findings, we recommend a minimum field of view that includes 1.5 times the mediolateral tibial width, starting 5 cm above the tibial plafond for tibial long-axis definitions. Implementing these findings will help improve foot and ankle research generalizability and impact clinical decisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220913PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112153DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tibial
9
foot ankle
8
superior-inferior axis
8
biplane fluoroscopy
8
field view
8
calculated based
8
gold standard
8
times mediolateral
8
mediolateral tibial
8
tibial width
8

Similar Publications