98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Transversus abdominis release (TAR) is an effective technique for treating large midline and off-midline hernias. Recent studies have demonstrated that robotic TAR (rTAR) is technically feasible and associated with improved outcomes compared to open surgery. There is no published experience to date describing abdominal wall reconstruction using the novel robotic platform HUGO RAS System (Medtronic®).
Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent a rTAR in our institution were included. Three of the four arm carts of the HUGO RAS System were used at any given time. Each arm configuration was defined by our team in conjunction with Medtronic® personnel. rTAR was performed as previously described. Upon completion of the TAR on one side, a redocking process with different, mirrored arms angles was performed to continue with the contralateral TAR. Operative variables and early morbidity were recorded.
Results: Ten patients were included in this study. The median BMI was 31 (21-40.6) kg/m. The median height was 1.6 m (1.5-1.89 m). A trend of decreased operative time, console time, and redocking time was seen in these consecutive cases. No intraoperative events nor postoperative morbidity was reported. The median length of stay was 3 (1-6) days.
Conclusion: Robotic TAR utilizing the HUGO RAS system is a feasible and safe procedure. The adoption of this procedure on this novel platform for the treatment of complex abdominal wall hernias has been successful for our team.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10865-0 | DOI Listing |
Arch Esp Urol
August 2025
Department of Urology II, European Interbalkan Medical Center, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece.
The literature on the exact incidence of equipment failure during urological surgery is rather heterogeneous. Although failure rates are unacceptably high in other surgical disciplines, more compelling evidence is needed in urology. The present study provides case examples to illustrate several instances of urological instrument malfunction encountered in daily surgical practice, from the field of endourology to the newer robotic systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Endosc
September 2025
Department for General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Background: While many ergonomic challenges traditionally faced in open and laparoscopic surgery have been overcome by robotic surgery, new challenges have been created. This study aims to identify and compare the ergonomic characteristics of a variety of robotic systems to ultimately lay the foundation for ergonomic guidelines.
Methods: Measurements evaluating the surgeon and their interaction with the new technology were applied in either a laboratory or a real-life setting.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis
September 2025
Department of Urology, Department of Health Science, University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Introduction: The introduction of novel robotic platforms has expanded surgical options for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, comparative outcomes with da Vinci multiport (MP) system remain unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative, early oncological, and functional outcomes of RARP performed with novel robotic platforms versus the da Vinci MP system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Robot Surg
September 2025
Ayub Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
J Robot Surg
September 2025
Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly preferred. New systems such as the Hugo™RAS enter the market, offering different pricing and modular architecture. While daVinci systems dominate U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF