Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

To evaluate the safety and explore the efficacy of use of ultra-rapid lispro (URLi, Lyumjev) insulin in the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ 1.5 technology in children, teenagers, and adults living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). At 14 U.S. diabetes centers, youth and adults with T1D completed a 16-day lead-in period using lispro in a t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ 1.5 technology, followed by a 13-week period in which URLi insulin was used in the pump. The trial included 179 individuals with T1D (age 6-75 years). With URLi, 1.7% (3 participants) had a severe hypoglycemia event over 13 weeks attributed to override boluses or a missed meal. No diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred. Two participants stopped URLi use because of infusion-site discomfort, and one stopped after developing a rash. Mean time 70-180 mg/dL increased from 65% ± 15% with lispro to 67% ± 13% with URLi ( = 0.004). Mean insulin treatment satisfaction questionnaire score improved from 75 ± 13 at screening to 80 ± 11 after 13 weeks of URLi use (mean difference = 6; 95% confidence interval 4-8; < 0.001), with the greatest improvement reported for confidence avoiding symptoms of high blood sugar. Mean treatment-related impact measure-diabetes score improved from 74 ± 12 to 80 ± 12 ( < 0.001), and mean TRIM-Diabetes Device (score improved from 82 ± 11 to 86 ± 12 ( < 0.001). URLi use in the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ 1.5 technology was safe for adult and pediatric participants with T1D, with quality-of-life benefits of URLi use perceived by the study participants. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT05403502.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0048DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control-iq technology
16
insulin pump
16
tslim insulin
12
pump control-iq
12
score improved
12
ultra-rapid lispro
8
type diabetes
8
urli
8
tandem tslim
8
improved 0001
8

Similar Publications

Background: Automated insulin delivery showed better results than standard insulin therapy, such as MDI. Therefore, we aimed to discuss the efficacy of Control IQ hybrid closed loop (HCL) during the daytime and nighttime for the type 1 diabetic population without restriction in age group or disease severity.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and related article citations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To evaluate the function and safety of the SteadiSet™ infusion set over a continuous 7-day wear period in adults with type 1 diabetes. Participants used a SteadiSet infusion set with a t:slim X2™ insulin pump with Control-IQ™ technology, and either insulin aspart or insulin lispro, for a target of 7 days for 12 consecutive wear periods. Each set removed before 7 days was adjudicated by an independent committee to assess the cause of early removal and to determine whether criteria for primary or key secondary endpoints were met.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) systems have shown promise in improving glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), yet real-world evidence remains limited. This study evaluated the impact of transitioning from multiple daily injections (MDI) or conventional continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) to the Tandem t:slim X2™ Control-IQ® AHCL system on glycemic outcomes in adults with T1D.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 56 non-pregnant adults with T1D were followed for 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

One-year evaluation of automated insulin delivery systems in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Front Digit Health

July 2025

Grupo de Endocrinología, Nutrición, Diabetes y Obesidad, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain.

Introduction: This study evaluates the effectiveness of four commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in routine clinical practice for type 1 diabetes management and compares their first-year outcomes.

Materials: This retrospective study (October 2020-October 2023) included glucometric data from type 1 diabetes patients collected from the Asturias Automatic Insulin Devices Registry. People with type 1 diabetes using four different AID systems [Minimed™780G (MM780G), Accu-Chek® Insight-Diabeloop (DBLG), Tandem-Control-IQ, and Ypsopump Cambridge HCL-app (Cam-APS)] were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study assessed real-world changes in glycemic and person-reported outcomes one-year after Control-IQ initiation in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Between October 2021 and December 2022, all children 6-18 years who started Control-IQ at 13 Belgian centers were consecutively recruited. Data were collected at start of Control-IQ and after 4, 8 and 12 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF