Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for chemotherapy-induced anemia affects progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving front-line chemotherapy following surgery for ovarian cancer (OC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who received front-line chemotherapy after surgery between 2013 and 2019 at six institutions. The patients were divided according to the use of ESAs during front-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of thromboembolism. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare survival between matched cohorts.

Results: Overall, 2147 patients (433 receiving ESA and 1714 for no-ESA) were identified, with a median follow-up of 44.0 months. The ESA group showed a significantly higher proportion of stage III/IV disease (81.8% vs 61.1%; P < 0.001) and postoperative gross residual disease (32.3% vs 21.2%; P < 0.001) than the no-ESA group. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the use of ESAs did not affect PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.20; P = 0.661). The incidence of thromboembolism was 10.2% in the ESA group and 4.6% in the no-ESA group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.58; 95% CI: 3.26-13.28; P < 0.001). When comparing the well-matched cohorts after PSM, PFS did not differ between the ESA (median PFS 23.5 months) and no-ESA groups (median PFS 22.2 months) (P = 0.540, log-rank test).

Conclusions: The use of ESAs during front-line chemotherapy did not negatively affect PFS in patients with OC after surgery but increased the risk of thromboembolism.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15533DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

front-line chemotherapy
16
ovarian cancer
8
chemotherapy surgery
8
patients
5
prognostic impact
4
impact erythropoietin-stimulating
4
erythropoietin-stimulating agent
4
front-line
4
agent front-line
4
chemotherapy
4

Similar Publications

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager that has recently transformed front-line treatment for many patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). It was originally studied in relapsed/refractory disease, then moved to targeting measurable residual disease (MRD), and has since been shown to improve outcomes for almost every age group when added to consolidation chemotherapy. The evidence supporting blinatumomab is most robust in adult and standard-risk pediatric age groups, but its benefit in adolescents and young adults and high-risk pediatric patients is not yet understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare, indolent lymphoproliferative disorder that is highly responsive to purine analog therapy. While agents such as cladribine and pentostatin remain standard front-line therapies, their long-term toxicities-particularly myelosuppression and immune dysfunction-have led to growing interest in chemotherapy-free agents. Recent advances in molecular characterization of HCL, including the near-universal presence of BRAF V600E mutations, have led to an era of targeted therapeutics for the treatment of this disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare malignancy driven by MAPK pathway activation and often involves BRAF V600E mutations. Targeted therapy with trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, is a promising alternative to conventional chemotherapy.

Procedure: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients treated with trametinib either at relapse or as front-line therapy between 2020 and 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The treatment landscape for EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has evolved significantly with multiple combination regimens demonstrating superiority over single agent Osimertinib over the past two years. Recent trials such as FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA have explored intensified front-line regimens, with FLAURA2 demonstrating improvement in PFS with the addition of chemotherapy to Osimertinib and MARIPOSA, showing both a PFS and OS benefit with a novel combination regimen of Amivantamab and Lazertinib. However, these regimens are associated with significantly higher toxicity to patients and pose a huge financial and logistical burden to the health care system; therefore, treatment selection must therefore be individualized, considering disease biology, patient fitness, and toxicity burden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Single-agent maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition may represent an effective strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer responding to platinum-based chemotherapy, including for molecular subtypes with suboptimal options. To explore this approach, we initiated the randomized phase IIb UTOLA trial (NCT03745950). Female patients without progression following front-line platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer were randomized 2:1 to twice-daily maintenance oral olaparib 300 mg or placebo until progression or intolerance, stratified by p53 status, mismatch repair status, and response to initial chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF