Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples.

Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Hapseong-dong, Masanhoewon-gu, Changwon-si, 51353, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Published: April 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The clinical significance of negative toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) is unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the significance of toxin EIA-negative in the diagnosis and prognosis of CDI.

Methods: All stool specimens submitted for C. difficile toxin EIA testing were cultured to isolate C. difficile. In-house PCR for tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, and cdtB genes were performed using C. difficile isolates. Stool specimens were tested with C. difficile toxins A and B using EIA kit (RIDASCREEN Clostridium difficile toxin A/B, R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany). Characteristics and subsequent CDI episodes of toxin EIA-negative and -positive patients were compared.

Results: Among 190 C. difficile PCR-positive patients, 83 (43.7%) were toxin EIA-negative. Multivariate analysis revealed independent associations toxin EIA-negative results and shorter hospital stays (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.013) and less high-risk antibiotic exposure in the preceding month (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.94, p = 0.035). Toxin EIA-negative patients displayed a significantly lower white blood cell count rate (11.0 vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001). Among the 54 patients who were toxin EIA-negative and did not receive CDI treatment, three (5.6%) were diagnosed with CDI after 7-21 days without complication.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that toxin EIA-negative patients had milder laboratory findings and no complications, despite not receiving treatment. Prolonged hospitalisation and exposure to high-risk antibiotics could potentially serve as markers for the development of toxin EIA-positive CDI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11046793PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00696-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

toxin eia-negative
20
difficile
8
clostridioides difficile
8
toxin
8
stool specimens
8
difficile toxin
8
eia-negative
5
clinical outcomes
4
outcomes treatment
4
treatment necessity
4

Similar Publications

Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples.

Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob

April 2024

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Hapseong-dong, Masanhoewon-gu, Changwon-si, 51353, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Purpose: The clinical significance of negative toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) is unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the significance of toxin EIA-negative in the diagnosis and prognosis of CDI.

Methods: All stool specimens submitted for C.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated diarrheal disease prevalent worldwide. A common diagnostic algorithm relies on a two-step protocol that employs stool enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the pathogen, and its toxins, respectively. Active CDI is deemed less likely when the Toxin EIA result is negative, even if the pathogen-specific EIA is positive for We recently reported, however, that low-toxin-producing strains recovered from Toxin-negative ('discrepant') clinical stool specimens can be fully pathogenic, and cause lethality in a rodent CDI model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characteristics and outcomes of infection after a change in the diagnostic testing algorithm.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

January 2024

Research Service and Infectious Diseases Section, Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois.

Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the detection of is a highly sensitive test. Some clinical laboratories have included a 2-step testing algorithm utilizing PCR plus toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to increase specificity.

Objective: To determine the risk factors and outcomes of PCR-positive/toxin-positive encounters compared to PCR-positive/toxin-negative encounters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Our aim was to determine changes in the incidence of CD infection (CDI) following the introduction of a two-step diagnostic algorithm and to analyze CDI cases diagnosed in the study period. We retrospectively studied CDI (January 2009 to July 2018) in adults diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (2009−2012) or toxin-EIA + polymerase chain reaction (PCR) algorithm (2013 onwards). A total of 443 patients with a first episode of CDI were included, 297 (67.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

infection (CDI) is most commonly diagnosed using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT); the low positive predictive value of these assays results in patients colonized with unnecessarily receiving CDI treatment antibiotics. The risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment in individuals with such cases are unknown. Fecal samples of NAAT-positive, toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-negative patients were collected before, during, and after randomization to vancomycin ( = 8) or placebo ( = 7).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF