98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: Gravity loading on lumbar intervertebral discs (IVDs) is affected by body position. Although the long-term effects of gravity on IVDs have been reported, the immediate effects of gravity on IVDs remain unclear. We considered that changes in IVD structure in the upright and supine positions provided new diagnostic information. Therefore, we compared the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), transverse relaxation time (T), and morphology of the lumbar spine between the quickly changing upright and supine positions using an original magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system that can obtain images in any position (multiposture MRI).
Material And Methods: On a 0.4-T multiposture MRI, diffusion-weighted images of the lumbar spine in seven healthy volunteers were obtained using single-shot diffusion echo-planar imaging (b = 0 and 600 s/mm) in quickly changing upright and supine positions. Moreover, spin-echo images with multiple echo times (echo time = 30, 60, 90, and 120 ms) were obtained in each position. We calculated the ADC and T of each IVD (L1 and S1) without any disc degeneration. In addition, the lumbar lordosis angle and length of the lumbar spine were measured to evaluate the morphology of the lumbar spine.
Results: The T of the IVD between L4 and L5 in the upright position was significantly lower than that in the supine position ( < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the ADC. The morphology of the lumbar spine did not differ significantly between the two positions.
Conclusion: The T of the IVD between L4 and L5 was likely decreased by the effect of gravity due to the postural change from supine to upright.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11021102 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_11_2024 | DOI Listing |
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine through a Delphi process a list of outcomes measures for clinicians to use when assessing individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS).
Methods: A three-phase Delphi process was conducted by the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS) Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Taskforce, including two online surveys, two virtual meetings, and three in-person consensus meetings at the ISSLS annual conferences (2023-2025). Participants evaluated and ranked outcome measures for LSS, with final endorsement requiring > 66% agreement.
Eur Spine J
September 2025
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Am J Hematol
September 2025
Calcium Metabolism and Osteoporosis Program, WHO Collaborating Center for Metabolic Bone Disorders, Division of Endocrinology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Cureus
August 2025
Spinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
For lumbar spinal canal stenosis, endoscopic spine surgery typically employs a unilateral approach. While this approach has the advantage of early access to the lamina, it risks damage to the facet joint on the entry side. Additionally, decompression of the ipsilateral lateral recess can be challenging, sometimes resulting in inadequate decompression laterally, leading to incomplete symptom relief.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is associated with thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) dysfunction. However, the structural effects of Gua Sha, a Traditional Chinese Medicine technique, remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the acute and short-term effects of Gua Sha therapy on TLF thickness, pain intensity, and related physiological parameters in patients with CNSLBP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF